Loading…

Sirolimus-eluting stent for treatment of complex in-stent restenosis: The first clinical experience

In this study, we assess the value of sirolimus eluting stent (SES) implantation in patients with complex in-stent restenosis (ISR). The treatment of ISR remains a therapeutic challenge, since many pharmacological and mechanical approaches have shown disappointing results. The SESs have been reporte...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the American College of Cardiology 2003-01, Vol.41 (2), p.184-189
Main Authors: DEGERTEKIN, Muzaffer, REGAR, Evelyn, POPMA, Jeffrey J, SERRUYS, Patrick W, TANABE, Kengo, SMITS, Pieter C, VAN DER GIESSEN, Willem J, CARLIER, Stephan G, DE FEYTER, Pim, VOS, Jeroen, FOLEY, David P, LIGTHART, Jurgen M. R
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this study, we assess the value of sirolimus eluting stent (SES) implantation in patients with complex in-stent restenosis (ISR). The treatment of ISR remains a therapeutic challenge, since many pharmacological and mechanical approaches have shown disappointing results. The SESs have been reported to be effective in de-novo coronary lesions. Sixteen patients with severe, recurrent ISR in a native coronary artery (average lesion length 18.4 mm) and objective evidence of ischemia were included. They received one or more 18 mm Bx VELOCITY SESs (Cordis Waterloo, Belgium). Quantitative angiographic and three-dimensional intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) follow-up was performed at four months, and clinical follow-up at nine months. The SES implantation (n = 26) was successful in all 16 patients. Four patients had recurrent restenosis following brachytherapy, and three patients had totally occluded vessels preprocedure. At four months follow-up, one patient had died and three patients had angiographic evidence of restenosis (one in-stent and two in-lesion). In-stent late lumen loss averaged 0.21 mm and the volume obstruction of the stent by IVUS was 1.1%. At nine months clinical follow-up, three patients had experienced four major adverse cardiac events (two deaths and one acute myocardial infarction necessitating repeat target vessel angioplasty). The SES implantation in patients with severe ISR lesions effectively prevents neointima formation and recurrent restenosis at four months angiographic follow-up.
ISSN:0735-1097
1558-3597
DOI:10.1016/S0735-1097(02)02704-3