Loading…

Can dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging perfusion data be analyzed using a model based on directional flow?

Purpose To examine the implications of a physiological model of cerebral blood that uses the contradictory assumption that blood flow in all voxels of DSCE‐MRI data sets is directional in nature. Analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DSCE‐MRI) uses techniqu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2003-02, Vol.17 (2), p.241-255
Main Authors: Thacker, N.A., Scott, M.L.J., Jackson, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose To examine the implications of a physiological model of cerebral blood that uses the contradictory assumption that blood flow in all voxels of DSCE‐MRI data sets is directional in nature. Analysis of dynamic susceptibility contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DSCE‐MRI) uses techniques based on indicator dilution theory. Underlying this approach is an assumption that blood flow through pixels of gray and white matter is entirely random in direction. Materials and Methods We have used a directional flow model to estimate theoretical blood flow velocities that would be observed through normal cerebral tissues. Estimates of flow velocities from individual pixels were made by measuring the mean transit time for net flow (nMTT). Measurements of nMTT were made for each voxel by estimating the mean difference in contrast arrival time between each of the adjacent six voxels. Results Examination of the spatial distribution of contrast arrival time from DSCE‐MRI data sets in normal volunteers demonstrated clear evidence of directional flow both in large vessels and in gray and white matter. The mean velocities of blood flow in gray and white matter in 12 normal volunteers were 0.25 ± 0.013 and 0.21 ± 0.014 cm/second, respectively, compared to predicted values of 0.25 and 0.18 cm/second. These values give measured nMTT for a 1‐mm isotropic voxel of gray and white matter of 0.45 ± 0.12 and 0.52 ± 0.11 seconds, respectively, compared to predicted values of 0.47 and 0.55 seconds. Conclusion A directional model of blood flow provides an alternative approach to the calculation of cerebral blood flow from (CBF) DSCE‐MRI data. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2003;17:241–255. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.10240