Loading…

Origin of the stereospecificity in binding hydroxamates of α- and β-phenylalanine methylamide to thermolysin revealed by the X-ray crystallographic study

Optically active N-formyl- N-hydroxy-α-phenylalanine methylamide ( 1) and N-formyl- N-hydroxy-β-phenylalanine methylamide ( 2) were evaluated as inhibitors for thermolysin (TLN) to find that while the d-form is more potent than its enantiomer in the case of the hydroxamate of α-Phe-NHMe, in the inhi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 2003-05, Vol.11 (11), p.2421-2426
Main Authors: Kim, Seung-Jun, Kim, Dong H, Park, Jung Dae, Woo, Joo-Rang, Jin, Yonghao, Ryu, Seong Eon
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Optically active N-formyl- N-hydroxy-α-phenylalanine methylamide ( 1) and N-formyl- N-hydroxy-β-phenylalanine methylamide ( 2) were evaluated as inhibitors for thermolysin (TLN) to find that while the d-form is more potent than its enantiomer in the case of the hydroxamate of α-Phe-NHMe, in the inhibition with hydroxamate of β-Phe-NHMe, the l-isomer ( K i=1.66±0.05 μM) is more effective than its enantiomer. In order to shed light on the stereochemical preference observed in the inhibitions, X-ray crystallographic analyses of the crystalline TLN· d- 1 and TLN· l- 2 complexes were performed to the resolution of 2.1 Å. While l- 2 binds TLN like substrate does with its benzyl aromatic ring occupying the S 1′ pocket, the electron density in the S 1′ pocket in the complex of TLN· d- 1 is weak and could best be accounted for by the methylcarbamoyl moiety. For both inhibitors, the hydroxamate moiety coordinates the active site zinc ion in a bidentate fashion. Graphic
ISSN:0968-0896
1464-3391
DOI:10.1016/S0968-0896(03)00140-8