Loading…

Attributes of a good physician: what are the opinions of first-year medical students?

BackgroundUndergraduate medical education is beginning to concern itself with educating students about professional attributes as well as about clinical knowledge and skills. Defining these characteristics, and in particular seeking the help of the students themselves to define them, can be a useful...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of medical ethics 2010-02, Vol.36 (2), p.121-125
Main Authors: Sehiralti, Mine, Akpinar, Aslihan, Ersoy, Nermin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-8facc49559c9993fd9f3f61559c6ada50b717cbe87152e2db161f5d344dd9d513
container_end_page 125
container_issue 2
container_start_page 121
container_title Journal of medical ethics
container_volume 36
creator Sehiralti, Mine
Akpinar, Aslihan
Ersoy, Nermin
description BackgroundUndergraduate medical education is beginning to concern itself with educating students about professional attributes as well as about clinical knowledge and skills. Defining these characteristics, and in particular seeking the help of the students themselves to define them, can be a useful starting point when considering how to incorporate aspects of professional behaviour into the medical curricula.MethodThis study explores the views of first-year medical students at Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine in the 2007–8 academic year. The students were asked the open-ended question: ‘What, in your opinion, are the attributes a good physician should have?’ Four topics were defined by researchers based on the undergraduate and graduate education projects. The attributes expressed by the students were evaluated by the researchers according to these topics and compared with the topics covered in the undergraduate and graduate education projects.ResultsA total of 127 students responded, and between them suggested 756 attributes. The majority of these attributes (54.6%) were concerned with interpersonal relations and communication, whereas the category representing the fewest attributes (12.3%) was that involving scientific knowledge and medical practice. In general, students' perception corresponded to the concept of the ‘competent physician’ as described in the professionalism projects, but attributes reflecting their world-view were also expressed.ConclusionExperience suggests that the active participation of students in determining which attributes are necessary for a good physician is a positive way of ensuring they embrace the importance of such qualities and attributes in themselves.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/jme.2009.032854
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733543568</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A220132980</galeid><jstor_id>20696736</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A220132980</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-8facc49559c9993fd9f3f61559c6ada50b717cbe87152e2db161f5d344dd9d513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkt2L1DAUxYMo7rj67JMS8EEQOuajSZp9kWHwC5fdRVzZt5A26Uxq24xJis5_b2rXVczLJZwf514OB4CnGK0xpvx1N9g1QUiuESUVK--BFS4FLUrCxH2wQhTxglcInYBHMXYoP1LJh-CEIExpieQKXG9SCq6eko3Qt1DDnfcGHvbH6BqnxzP4Y68T1MHCtLfQH9zo_PgbbV2IqThaHeBgjWt0D2OajB1TfPMYPGh1H-2T23kKrt-9_bL9UJxfvv-43ZwXNRU4FVWrm6aUjMlGSklbI1vacjz_uTaaoVpg0dS2EpgRS0yNOW6ZoWVpjDQM01PwcvE9BP99sjGpwcXG9r0erZ-iEpSykjJeZfLFf2TnpzDm4xQWFUZS4HL2KxZqp3ur3Nj4MdmfqfF9b3dW5du3l2pD5viIrFDmn9-6TnUOQR2CG3Q4qj_5ZuDZAnQx-fCPziUXlP9d6GJedKfr8E1lXTB18XWrri4-Xd3Qzzdq9nu18PXQ3dEYqbkMKpdBzWVQSxnoL4NboMI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1781097141</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Attributes of a good physician: what are the opinions of first-year medical students?</title><source>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><creator>Sehiralti, Mine ; Akpinar, Aslihan ; Ersoy, Nermin</creator><creatorcontrib>Sehiralti, Mine ; Akpinar, Aslihan ; Ersoy, Nermin</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundUndergraduate medical education is beginning to concern itself with educating students about professional attributes as well as about clinical knowledge and skills. Defining these characteristics, and in particular seeking the help of the students themselves to define them, can be a useful starting point when considering how to incorporate aspects of professional behaviour into the medical curricula.MethodThis study explores the views of first-year medical students at Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine in the 2007–8 academic year. The students were asked the open-ended question: ‘What, in your opinion, are the attributes a good physician should have?’ Four topics were defined by researchers based on the undergraduate and graduate education projects. The attributes expressed by the students were evaluated by the researchers according to these topics and compared with the topics covered in the undergraduate and graduate education projects.ResultsA total of 127 students responded, and between them suggested 756 attributes. The majority of these attributes (54.6%) were concerned with interpersonal relations and communication, whereas the category representing the fewest attributes (12.3%) was that involving scientific knowledge and medical practice. In general, students' perception corresponded to the concept of the ‘competent physician’ as described in the professionalism projects, but attributes reflecting their world-view were also expressed.ConclusionExperience suggests that the active participation of students in determining which attributes are necessary for a good physician is a positive way of ensuring they embrace the importance of such qualities and attributes in themselves.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0306-6800</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1473-4257</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/jme.2009.032854</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20133409</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMETDR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Altruism ; Attitude of Health Personnel ; Attitudes ; Bioethics ; Clinical Competence ; Communication ; Curricula ; Education ; Education, Medical, Undergraduate - ethics ; education/programmes ; Ethical instruction ; Ethics ; Female ; Humans ; Interpersonal communication ; Interpersonal Relations ; Job Satisfaction ; Knowledge ; Male ; Medical education ; medical ethics ; Medical practice ; Medical schools ; Medical students ; Medicine ; Nursing students ; Physician's Role ; Physicians ; Professional Competence ; Professional ethics ; Professionalism ; Role models ; Students, Medical - psychology ; Study and teaching ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Teaching and learning ethics ; undergraduate medical education ; University faculty ; Values ; virtues</subject><ispartof>Journal of medical ethics, 2010-02, Vol.36 (2), p.121-125</ispartof><rights>2009, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited For permission to use, (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><rights>Copyright: © 2010 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and the Institute of Medical Ethics</rights><rights>Copyright: 2009 (c) 2009, Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited For permission to use, (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-8facc49559c9993fd9f3f61559c6ada50b717cbe87152e2db161f5d344dd9d513</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1781097141/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1781097141?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12861,21394,27924,27925,33611,33612,34775,34776,43733,44200,58238,58471,74221,74728</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20133409$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sehiralti, Mine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akpinar, Aslihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ersoy, Nermin</creatorcontrib><title>Attributes of a good physician: what are the opinions of first-year medical students?</title><title>Journal of medical ethics</title><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><description>BackgroundUndergraduate medical education is beginning to concern itself with educating students about professional attributes as well as about clinical knowledge and skills. Defining these characteristics, and in particular seeking the help of the students themselves to define them, can be a useful starting point when considering how to incorporate aspects of professional behaviour into the medical curricula.MethodThis study explores the views of first-year medical students at Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine in the 2007–8 academic year. The students were asked the open-ended question: ‘What, in your opinion, are the attributes a good physician should have?’ Four topics were defined by researchers based on the undergraduate and graduate education projects. The attributes expressed by the students were evaluated by the researchers according to these topics and compared with the topics covered in the undergraduate and graduate education projects.ResultsA total of 127 students responded, and between them suggested 756 attributes. The majority of these attributes (54.6%) were concerned with interpersonal relations and communication, whereas the category representing the fewest attributes (12.3%) was that involving scientific knowledge and medical practice. In general, students' perception corresponded to the concept of the ‘competent physician’ as described in the professionalism projects, but attributes reflecting their world-view were also expressed.ConclusionExperience suggests that the active participation of students in determining which attributes are necessary for a good physician is a positive way of ensuring they embrace the importance of such qualities and attributes in themselves.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Altruism</subject><subject>Attitude of Health Personnel</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Bioethics</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - ethics</subject><subject>education/programmes</subject><subject>Ethical instruction</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interpersonal communication</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relations</subject><subject>Job Satisfaction</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>medical ethics</subject><subject>Medical practice</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>Medical students</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Nursing students</subject><subject>Physician's Role</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Professional Competence</subject><subject>Professional ethics</subject><subject>Professionalism</subject><subject>Role models</subject><subject>Students, Medical - psychology</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Teaching and learning ethics</subject><subject>undergraduate medical education</subject><subject>University faculty</subject><subject>Values</subject><subject>virtues</subject><issn>0306-6800</issn><issn>1473-4257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2R</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkt2L1DAUxYMo7rj67JMS8EEQOuajSZp9kWHwC5fdRVzZt5A26Uxq24xJis5_b2rXVczLJZwf514OB4CnGK0xpvx1N9g1QUiuESUVK--BFS4FLUrCxH2wQhTxglcInYBHMXYoP1LJh-CEIExpieQKXG9SCq6eko3Qt1DDnfcGHvbH6BqnxzP4Y68T1MHCtLfQH9zo_PgbbV2IqThaHeBgjWt0D2OajB1TfPMYPGh1H-2T23kKrt-9_bL9UJxfvv-43ZwXNRU4FVWrm6aUjMlGSklbI1vacjz_uTaaoVpg0dS2EpgRS0yNOW6ZoWVpjDQM01PwcvE9BP99sjGpwcXG9r0erZ-iEpSykjJeZfLFf2TnpzDm4xQWFUZS4HL2KxZqp3ur3Nj4MdmfqfF9b3dW5du3l2pD5viIrFDmn9-6TnUOQR2CG3Q4qj_5ZuDZAnQx-fCPziUXlP9d6GJedKfr8E1lXTB18XWrri4-Xd3Qzzdq9nu18PXQ3dEYqbkMKpdBzWVQSxnoL4NboMI</recordid><startdate>201002</startdate><enddate>201002</enddate><creator>Sehiralti, Mine</creator><creator>Akpinar, Aslihan</creator><creator>Ersoy, Nermin</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</general><general>Institute of Medical Ethics and BMJ Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201002</creationdate><title>Attributes of a good physician: what are the opinions of first-year medical students?</title><author>Sehiralti, Mine ; Akpinar, Aslihan ; Ersoy, Nermin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-8facc49559c9993fd9f3f61559c6ada50b717cbe87152e2db161f5d344dd9d513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Altruism</topic><topic>Attitude of Health Personnel</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Bioethics</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education, Medical, Undergraduate - ethics</topic><topic>education/programmes</topic><topic>Ethical instruction</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interpersonal communication</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relations</topic><topic>Job Satisfaction</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>medical ethics</topic><topic>Medical practice</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>Medical students</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Nursing students</topic><topic>Physician's Role</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Professional Competence</topic><topic>Professional ethics</topic><topic>Professionalism</topic><topic>Role models</topic><topic>Students, Medical - psychology</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Teaching and learning ethics</topic><topic>undergraduate medical education</topic><topic>University faculty</topic><topic>Values</topic><topic>virtues</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sehiralti, Mine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akpinar, Aslihan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ersoy, Nermin</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Art, Design and Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sehiralti, Mine</au><au>Akpinar, Aslihan</au><au>Ersoy, Nermin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Attributes of a good physician: what are the opinions of first-year medical students?</atitle><jtitle>Journal of medical ethics</jtitle><addtitle>J Med Ethics</addtitle><date>2010-02</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>125</epage><pages>121-125</pages><issn>0306-6800</issn><eissn>1473-4257</eissn><coden>JMETDR</coden><abstract>BackgroundUndergraduate medical education is beginning to concern itself with educating students about professional attributes as well as about clinical knowledge and skills. Defining these characteristics, and in particular seeking the help of the students themselves to define them, can be a useful starting point when considering how to incorporate aspects of professional behaviour into the medical curricula.MethodThis study explores the views of first-year medical students at Kocaeli University Faculty of Medicine in the 2007–8 academic year. The students were asked the open-ended question: ‘What, in your opinion, are the attributes a good physician should have?’ Four topics were defined by researchers based on the undergraduate and graduate education projects. The attributes expressed by the students were evaluated by the researchers according to these topics and compared with the topics covered in the undergraduate and graduate education projects.ResultsA total of 127 students responded, and between them suggested 756 attributes. The majority of these attributes (54.6%) were concerned with interpersonal relations and communication, whereas the category representing the fewest attributes (12.3%) was that involving scientific knowledge and medical practice. In general, students' perception corresponded to the concept of the ‘competent physician’ as described in the professionalism projects, but attributes reflecting their world-view were also expressed.ConclusionExperience suggests that the active participation of students in determining which attributes are necessary for a good physician is a positive way of ensuring they embrace the importance of such qualities and attributes in themselves.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Institute of Medical Ethics</pub><pmid>20133409</pmid><doi>10.1136/jme.2009.032854</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0306-6800
ispartof Journal of medical ethics, 2010-02, Vol.36 (2), p.121-125
issn 0306-6800
1473-4257
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_733543568
source Art, Design and Architecture Collection; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection
subjects Accountability
Altruism
Attitude of Health Personnel
Attitudes
Bioethics
Clinical Competence
Communication
Curricula
Education
Education, Medical, Undergraduate - ethics
education/programmes
Ethical instruction
Ethics
Female
Humans
Interpersonal communication
Interpersonal Relations
Job Satisfaction
Knowledge
Male
Medical education
medical ethics
Medical practice
Medical schools
Medical students
Medicine
Nursing students
Physician's Role
Physicians
Professional Competence
Professional ethics
Professionalism
Role models
Students, Medical - psychology
Study and teaching
Surveys and Questionnaires
Teaching and learning ethics
undergraduate medical education
University faculty
Values
virtues
title Attributes of a good physician: what are the opinions of first-year medical students?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A39%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Attributes%20of%20a%20good%20physician:%20what%20are%20the%20opinions%20of%20first-year%20medical%20students?&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20medical%20ethics&rft.au=Sehiralti,%20Mine&rft.date=2010-02&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=125&rft.pages=121-125&rft.issn=0306-6800&rft.eissn=1473-4257&rft.coden=JMETDR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/jme.2009.032854&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA220132980%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b371t-8facc49559c9993fd9f3f61559c6ada50b717cbe87152e2db161f5d344dd9d513%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1781097141&rft_id=info:pmid/20133409&rft_galeid=A220132980&rft_jstor_id=20696736&rfr_iscdi=true