Differences in twitch potentiation between voluntary and stimulated quadriceps contractions of equal intensity

• Published in: Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 2010-02, Vol.20 (1), p.e56-e62
• Main Authors: Jubeau, M., Gondin, J., Martin, A., Van Hoecke, J., Maffiuletti, N. A.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Anatomy & physiology; Conditioning; Electric Stimulation; Electrical stimulation; Electromyography; Femoral Nerve - physiology; Force; Health; Humans; Isometrics; Knee; Knees; M wave; Male; Motor Neurons - physiology; Motor units; Muscle Contraction - physiology; Muscle Fibers, Skeletal - physiology; peak torque; Physical fitness; Quadriceps Muscle - physiology; Recruitment, Neurophysiological - physiology; Sport science; Stimuli; Torque; twitch; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0905-7188; 1600-0838
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.00897.x

This study compared the extent of twitch and M‐wave potentiation (POT) between voluntary and stimulated quadriceps contractions performed at the same intensity. Sixteen healthy men completed 10‐s isometric knee extensions at 40% of the maximal voluntary contraction torque under electrical stimulation and voluntary conditions. Single stimuli were delivered to the femoral nerve to evoke twitches before (PRE) and from 3 to 600 s after the end of each conditioning contraction. Changes in twitch contractile properties and M‐wave characteristics were compared between the conditions. The extent of twitch peak torque POT was smaller for the stimulated (122±20% of PRE) than for the voluntary condition (133±20% of PRE). The magnitude of POT for the maximal rate of twitch torque development was also smaller for the stimulated trial. Rectus femoris M‐wave amplitude was potentiated by the voluntary but not by the stimulated contraction. It was concluded that stimulated contractions resulted in smaller twitch and M‐wave POT than voluntary contractions, despite equivalent torque output and duration. The spatially and temporally fixed recruitment of motor units with electrical stimulation and therefore the lower number of activated motor units compared with voluntary actions of equal intensity could explain the present findings.