Effect of container, vitrification volume and warming solution on cryosurvival of in vitro-produced bovine embryos

• Published in: Animal reproduction science 2010-03, Vol.118 (1), p.19-24
• Main Authors: Rios, G.L., Mucci, N.C., Kaiser, G.G., Alberio, R.H.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Cattle; Cattle - embryology; Cattle - physiology; Cell Survival - drug effects; containers; cryopreservation; Cryopreservation - methods; Cryopreservation - veterinary; Cryoprotective Agents - pharmacology; Culture Media - pharmacology; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embryo; embryo (animal); Embryo Culture Techniques; Embryo, Mammalian; Female; Fertilization in Vitro - methods; Fertilization in Vitro - veterinary; Glass; Glass capillary; Hot Temperature; In vitro; in vitro fertilization; methodology; OPS; plastics; Plastics - pharmacology; Product Packaging - instrumentation; Product Packaging - methods; Solutions - pharmacology; Vitrification; volume; warming solution
• ISSN: 0378-4320; 1873-2232
• DOI: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2009.06.015

The aim of the present research was to develop a low cost and easy to perform vitrification method for in vitro-produced cattle embryos. Effect of container material was evaluated (plastic straw compared to glass capillary, experiment 1), two volume sample (1 compared to 0.5 μL, experiment 2) and warming solution composition medium (Tissue Culture Medium 199 (TCM-199) compared to phosphate buffered saline (PBS), experiment 3) as modifications of the open pulled straw (OPS) system in order to reduce embryo damage caused by exposure to cold. In all experiments, day 7 and expanded blastocysts of cattle were exposed to the vitrification solution 1 for 3 min and 30 s in solution 2. After this, embryos were placed in a droplet and loaded in a narrow end container, and immediately submerged into liquid nitrogen. For warming, vitrified embryos were plunged into warming solution 1 for 3 min, and transferred into warming solution 2 for 1 min. Fresh embryos kept in culture were used as control group. Hatching rates were recorded in all cases at day 13. In experiment 1 there was no significant effect of container material on hatching rates. Postwarming survival rate of vitrified embryos was lower than control (27.5% plastic straws, 18.9% glass capillary and 80.5% control, P < 0.05). In experiment 2, there was no significant effect of volume in hatching rates (58.3% 1 μL, 61.3% 0.5 μL and 80.5% control, P < 0.05). In experiment 3, the composition of the holding medium of warming solution influenced hatching rates (84.1% TCM-199, 74.8% PBS and 91.1% control P < 0.05). These data suggest that neither glass capillaries nor reduced sample volume could improve hatching rates after vitrification–warming with open pulled straw (OPS) procedure, and that PBS can replace TCM-199 in warming solutions, but lesser hatching rates should be expected.