Loading…
Photoplethysmography, an Easy and Accurate Method for Measuring Ankle Brachial Pressure Index: Can Photoplethysmography Replace Doppler?
Objective: To assess the accuracy of ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) assessed by photoplethysmography (PPG) compared with continuous wave Doppler (CW-Doppler). Methods: Ankle brachial pressure index was measured in a standard manner using both PPG and Doppler probes. For PPG-ABPI, a PPG probe w...
Saved in:
Published in: | Vascular and endovascular surgery 2009-12, Vol.43 (6), p.578-582 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Objective: To assess the accuracy of ankle brachial pressure index (ABPI) assessed by photoplethysmography (PPG) compared with continuous wave Doppler (CW-Doppler). Methods: Ankle brachial pressure index was measured in a standard manner using both PPG and Doppler probes. For PPG-ABPI, a PPG probe was placed on the index finger and great toe, and a microcomputer determined the ABPI. These values were compared with the ABPI measured manually using an 8-MHz Doppler probe. Correlation and agreement between PPG and Doppler ABPI were assessed by Lin’s correlation coefficient and Bland—Altman plots. Results: In all, 133 claudicants were assessed. There was a strong correlation between the 2 ABPI methods (β = .79 and 95% limits of agreement of —0.23 to 0.24). Conclusion: Measuring ABPI automatically using the PPG technique is an effective alternative for Doppler ABPI. PPG-ABPI is completely objective, fast, and accurate. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1538-5744 1938-9116 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1538574409334829 |