Loading…

Does donor race still make a difference in deceased-donor African-American renal allograft recipients?

Abstract Background Prior studies have demonstrated that African-American (AA) donor kidneys are independently associated with an increased risk for graft loss. Methods We examined outcomes in comparable groups of AA deceased-donor (DD) kidney transplant patients receiving an AA donor (n = 35) versu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of surgery 2010-03, Vol.199 (3), p.305-309
Main Authors: Brown, Kristian L., M.D, Doshi, Mona D., M.D, Singh, Atul, M.D, Mehta, Kalyani, M.D, Morawski, Katherina, R.N., B.S.N., C.N.N, Cincotta, Elizabeth, Pharm.D, West, Miguel S., M.D., F.A.C.S, Gruber, Scott A., M.D., Ph.D., M.B.A., F.A.C.S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Background Prior studies have demonstrated that African-American (AA) donor kidneys are independently associated with an increased risk for graft loss. Methods We examined outcomes in comparable groups of AA deceased-donor (DD) kidney transplant patients receiving an AA donor (n = 35) versus a Caucasian donor (C group; n = 150) organ. Results There were no differences between AA and C groups in patient survival, new-onset diabetes, or BK nephropathy. The AA group demonstrated a significantly higher 6-month and overall incidence of acute rejection (AR), increased cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, and decreased graft survival. Recurrent or de novo focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) accounted for a significantly higher fraction of graft losses in the AA versus C group. Conclusions AA DD renal allograft recipients have equivalent patient but decreased graft survival when transplanted with an AA versus C kidney using current immunosuppression. This may be the result of increased AR, CMV infection, and recurrence/development of FSGS.
ISSN:0002-9610
1879-1883
DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.025