Loading…

Evaluation of the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope after failed direct laryngoscopy

Summary Unanticipated difficulties during tracheal intubation and failure to intubate are among the leading causes of anaesthesia‐related morbidity and mortality. Using the technique of video laryngoscopy, the alignment of the oral and pharyngeal axes to facilitate tracheal intubation is unnecessary...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anaesthesia 2010-07, Vol.65 (7), p.716-720
Main Authors: Noppens, R. R., Möbus, S., Heid, F., Schmidtmann, I., Werner, C., Piepho, T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Unanticipated difficulties during tracheal intubation and failure to intubate are among the leading causes of anaesthesia‐related morbidity and mortality. Using the technique of video laryngoscopy, the alignment of the oral and pharyngeal axes to facilitate tracheal intubation is unnecessary. In this study we evaluated the McGrath® Series 5 videolaryngoscope for tracheal intubation in 61 patients who exhibited Cormack and Lehane grade 3 or 4 laryngoscopies with a Macintosh laryngoscope. Using the McGrath resulted in an improved glottic view, compared to Macintosh laryngoscope. Laryngoscopy was improved by one grade in 10%, by two grades in 80% and by three grades in 10% of cases (p 
ISSN:0003-2409
1365-2044
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06388.x