Loading…
Penile block is associated with less urinary retention than caudal anesthesia in distal hypospadia repair in children
Background Caudal anesthesia (CA) is widely recommended due to excellent analgesia in distal hypospadia repairs, but its potential side effect on urinary retention interferes with patient comfort. To objective is to determine the impact of CA versus penile block (PB) on postoperative micturition. Me...
Saved in:
Published in: | World journal of urology 2010-02, Vol.28 (1), p.87-91 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
Caudal anesthesia (CA) is widely recommended due to excellent analgesia in distal hypospadia repairs, but its potential side effect on urinary retention interferes with patient comfort. To objective is to determine the impact of CA versus penile block (PB) on postoperative micturition.
Methods
Sixty distal hypospadia repairs performed over a 48-month period were analyzed concerning the impact of applicated analgesia on postoperative micturition. Inclusion criteria were Mathieu or Snodgrass procedures, use of a non-dribbling urethral stent, CA or PB. Endpoint was first postoperative micturation (6 h).
Results
CA was used in 27 and PB in 33 cases. Compared groups had similar age (mean: 31 months, range 12–68 vs. 28 months, range: 14–145), weight (mean: 13 kg, range 9–18 vs. 15 kg, range 8–59), operation duration (mean 61 min, range 30–105 vs. mean 67 min, range 35–120) and surgical technique (Mathieu/Snodgrass: 7/20 CA vs. 19/14 PB). Micturation was significantly less impaired in the PB than CA group (5/33 vs. 15/27;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0724-4983 1433-8726 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00345-009-0420-2 |