Loading…
Compared with dual nerve stimulation, ultrasound guidance shortens the time for infraclavicular block performance
Purpose The success rate for infraclavicular brachial plexus block using nerve stimulation reportedly ranges from 60 to 80%. Ultrasound guidance may be associated with greater success. This study compared ultrasound guided infraclavicular block with a dual motor endpoint nerve stimulation technique....
Saved in:
Published in: | Canadian journal of anesthesia 2009-11, Vol.56 (11), p.812-818 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
The success rate for infraclavicular brachial plexus block using nerve stimulation reportedly ranges from 60 to 80%. Ultrasound guidance may be associated with greater success. This study compared ultrasound guided infraclavicular block with a dual motor endpoint nerve stimulation technique.
Methods
One hundred three hand surgery patients were randomized to receive either ultrasound-guided (ultrasound group) or dual motor endpoint nerve stimulation (stimulation group) infraclavicular block using 2% lidocaine 15 mL and 0.5% bupivacaine 15 mL with epinephrine. Block success was defined as loss of sensation to pinprick in each of the radial, ulnar, median, and musculocutaneous nerve distributions when measured 20 min after block performance. Block performance time, readiness for surgery (no supplemental block, skin infiltration, or general anesthesia), and complications were also assessed.
Results
Patient characteristics were similar between groups. Success rate was 92% in the ultrasound group and 80% in the stimulation group (
P
= 0.18). Block performance time was shorter in the ultrasound group (median 5 min) compared with the stimulation group (median 10.5 min) (
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0832-610X 1496-8975 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12630-009-9170-2 |