Loading…

Re-interventions, Readmissions and Discharge Destination: Modern Metrics for the Assessment of the Quality of Care

Abstract Aim To determine whether administrative data can be used to determine metrics to inform the quality agenda. To determine the relationship between these metrics and the method of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair undertaken. Methods The Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data were taken...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery 2010-01, Vol.39 (1), p.49-54
Main Authors: Holt, P.J.E, Poloniecki, J.D, Hofman, D, Hinchliffe, R.J, Loftus, I.M, Thompson, M.M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Aim To determine whether administrative data can be used to determine metrics to inform the quality agenda. To determine the relationship between these metrics and the method of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair undertaken. Methods The Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data were taken for a 5-year period (01.04.2003–31.03.2008). Cases of elective AAA repair were identified. Outcomes were determined in terms of mortality, discharge destination, re-intervention rates and emergency readmission rates. The results were interpreted in light of whether AAA repair was open or endovascular and whether patients were octogenarians or younger patients. Results There were 18,060 elective AAA repairs with a mean in-hospital mortality rate of 5.9%. Of these 14,141 were open repairs with a mean mortality of 6.5% and 3919 EVAR (22%) with a mean mortality of 3.8%. EVAR patients were less likely to be discharged to ongoing care ( p  
ISSN:1078-5884
1532-2165
DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.10.003