Loading…
Basic approaches used in American and Soviet clinical neuropsychology
Among that rapidly developing group of sciences of the nervous system that are now called the neurosciences, a special place is occupied by neuropsychology. Clinical neuropsychology differs from the other members of the group of neurological disciplines in that its concern lies with the role of indi...
Saved in:
Published in: | The American psychologist 1977-11, Vol.32 (11), p.959-968 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Among that rapidly developing group of sciences of the nervous system that are now called the neurosciences, a special place is occupied by neuropsychology. Clinical neuropsychology differs from the other members of the group of neurological disciplines in that its concern lies with the role of individual brain systems in the organization of human psychological activity and how these systems are altered upon brain-behavior disturbance. Two current but differing approaches, one American and one Soviet, are used in clinical neuropsychology for assessment of brain-behavior disturbance. The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery, quantitative in approach, is presented and contrasted with the qualitative syndrome-analysis scheme of clinical investigation used by Soviet neuropsychologists. Both approaches are considered in terms of their merits, clinical assets and limitations, influence on generating further scientific research questions, and contributions to the understanding of the functional organization of brain-behavior activity. Fundamental differences in the approaches--principles of work, theoretical differences, practical importance for psychology and medicine, and prospects for clinical neuropsychology's future--are summarized. (20 ref) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-066X 1935-990X |
DOI: | 10.1037/0003-066X.32.11.959 |