Loading…
Has the California Tobacco Control Program Reduced Smoking?
CONTEXT.— Comprehensive community-wide tobacco control programs are considered appropriate public health approaches to reduce population smoking prevalence. OBJECTIVE.— To examine trends in smoking behavior before, during, and after the California Tobacco Control Program. DESIGN.— Per capita cigaret...
Saved in:
Published in: | JAMA : the journal of the American Medical Association 1998-09, Vol.280 (10), p.893-899 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | CONTEXT.— Comprehensive community-wide tobacco control programs are considered
appropriate public health approaches to reduce population smoking prevalence. OBJECTIVE.— To examine trends in smoking behavior before, during, and after the
California Tobacco Control Program. DESIGN.— Per capita cigarette consumption data (1983-1997) were derived from
tobacco industry sales figures. Adult (≥18 years) smoking prevalence data
were obtained from the National Health Interview Surveys (1978-1994), the
California Tobacco Surveys (1990-1996), the Current Population Surveys (1992-1996),
and the California Behavioral Risk Factor Survey and its supplement (1991-1997).
Trends were compared before and after introduction of the program, with the
period after the program being divided into 2 parts (early, 1989-1993; late,
1994-1996). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES.— Change in cigarette consumption and smoking prevalence in California
compared with the rest of the United States. RESULTS.— Per capita cigarette consumption declined 52% faster in California in
the early period than previously (from 9.7 packs per person per month at the
beginning of the program to 6.5 packs per person per month in 1993), and the
decline was significantly greater in California than in the rest of the United
States (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0098-7484 1538-3598 |
DOI: | 10.1001/jama.280.10.893 |