Ceftazidime: in-vitro antibacterial activity and susceptibility to β-lactamases compared with that of cefotaxime, moxalactam and other β-lactam antibiotics

• Published in: Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy 1981-09, Vol.8 (suppl-B), p.23-31
• Main Authors: Phillips, Ian, Warren, Christine, Shannon, Kevin, King, Anna, Hanslo, David
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Anti-Bacterial Agents - metabolism; Anti-Bacterial Agents - pharmacology; Bacteria - drug effects; Bacteria - enzymology; Bacteria, Anaerobic - drug effects; Bacterial Infections - microbiology; beta-Lactamases - metabolism; beta-Lactams - metabolism; Cefotaxime - metabolism; Cefotaxime - pharmacology; Ceftazidime - metabolism; Ceftazidime - pharmacology; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Gram-Negative Aerobic Bacteria - drug effects; Humans; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus - drug effects; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Moxalactam - metabolism; Moxalactam - pharmacology; Staphylococcus - drug effects
• ISSN: 0305-7453; 1460-2091
• DOI: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_B.23

The in-vitro antibacterial activity of ceftazidime was assessed against recent clinical isolates of common bacteria and also against reference strains that produced known β-lactamases. The compound was active, though less so than cephaloridine against staphylococci and streptococci with MICs mostly 0.12–2 mg/l for streptococci and 8 mg/l for staphylococci, but enterococci (MICs ≥ 64 mg/l) and methicillin-resistant staphylococci (MICs 16–32 mg/l) were resistant. Penicillin-resistant pneumococci (MICs 2–4 mg/;) were much less sensitive than other pneumococci (MICs 0.12–0.25 mg/l). Ceftazidime was also active, but slightly less so than cefotaxime or moxalactam, against enterobacteria (MICs mostly 0.12–0.25 mg/l). Its activity was also inferior to that of cefotaxime against Neisseria gonorrhoeae (MICs mostly 0.03–0.06 mg/l) and Haemophilus influenzae (MICs mostly 0.06–0.25 mg/l). However it was about eightfold more active than cefotaxime or moxalactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MICs mostly 1–4 mg/l), and it was also more active than these compounds against other pseudomonads. Ceftazidime was less active than cefoxitin against Bacteroides spp. (MICs mostly 16–64mg/l for Bact. fragilis and 2–8 mg/l for other bacteroides) and less active than ampicillin or cefoxitin against other anaerobes. The compound was highly resistant to hydrolysis by most β-lactamases including OXA-1 and the enzymes from Klebsiella 1082E and Proteus vulgaris PC37 which hydrolyse cefuroxime and cefotaxime. However, it was hydrolysed slowly by the enzyme from a highly ampicillin-resistant isolate of Bact. fragilis.