Loading…
Face Aftereffects Indicate Dissociable, but Not Distinct, Coding of Male and Female Faces
It has been claimed that exposure to distorted faces of one sex induces perceptual aftereffects for test faces that are of the same sex, but not for test faces of the other sex ( A. C. Little, L. M. DeBruine, & B. C. Jones, 2005 ). This result suggests that male and female faces have separate ne...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance 2008-02, Vol.34 (1), p.101-112 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | It has been claimed that exposure to distorted faces of one sex induces perceptual aftereffects for test faces that are of the same sex, but not for test faces of the other sex (
A. C. Little, L. M. DeBruine, & B. C. Jones, 2005
). This result suggests that male and female faces have separate neural coding. Given the high degree of visual similarity between faces of different sexes, this result is surprising. The authors reinvestigated male and female face coding using a different face distortion. In Experiment 1, participants adapted to distorted faces from one sex (e.g., male contracted faces) and were tested with faces of both sexes. Aftereffects were found for both male and female faces, suggesting the existence of common coding mechanisms. In Experiments 2 and 3, participants adapted to oppositely distorted faces from both sexes (male contracted and female expanded faces). Weak opposite aftereffects were found for male and female faces, suggesting the existence of sex-selective face coding mechanisms. Taken together, these results indicate that both common and sex-selective mechanisms code male and female faces. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0096-1523 1939-1277 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0096-1523.34.1.101 |