Loading…
When Nonsense Sounds Happy or Helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)
This article introduces an instrument for the indirect assessment of positive and negative affect, the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). This test draws on participant ratings of the extent to which artificial words subjectively convey various emotions. Factor analyses of these ra...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of personality and social psychology 2009-09, Vol.97 (3), p.500-516 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-9842e3c47534cafa5c29c8b530daeb447142585fed12c15f671c4eed462541983 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 516 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 500 |
container_title | Journal of personality and social psychology |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Quirin, Markus Kazén, Miguel Kuhl, Julius |
description | This article introduces an instrument for the indirect assessment of positive and negative affect, the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). This test draws on participant ratings of the extent to which artificial words subjectively convey various emotions. Factor analyses of these ratings yielded two independent factors that can be interpreted as implicit positive and negative affect. The corresponding scales show adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, stability (Study 1), and construct validity (Study 2). Studies 3 and 4 demonstrate that the IPANAT also measures state variance. Finally, Study 5 provides criterion-based validity by demonstrating that correlations between implicit affect and explicit affect are higher under conditions of spontaneous responding than under conditions of reflective responding to explicit affect scales. The present findings suggest that the IPANAT is a reliable and valid measure with a straightforward application procedure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/a0016063 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_742718860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67590044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-9842e3c47534cafa5c29c8b530daeb447142585fed12c15f671c4eed462541983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V1LHDEUBuBQlO5WBX-BDKV-gIw9J9-5FGldQfRCpZchm8nQldmZabJzsf_eLLu1VGSFQEh4OJxzXkIOES4QmPruAFCCZJ_IGA0zJTIUO2QMQGnJBPIR-ZLSMwBwQelnMkIjtcyvMTn59Tu0xV3XppBP8dANbZWKiev7ZdHFYhKavgkp7ZPd2jUpHGzuPfL088fj1aS8vb--ubq8LR03bFEazWlgnivBuHe1E54ar6eCQeXClHOFnAot6lAh9ShqqdDzECouqeBoNNsjp-u6fez-DCEt7HyWfGga14ZuSFZxqlDn3rM82SqlEiZPyD-ELBdkoDDDr2_gczfENo9rJXIBHCXdhigYDVoKkdHZGvnYpRRDbfs4m7u4tAh2FZj9G1imR5t6w3Qeqn9wk1AGxxvgkndNHV3rZ-nVUdTUCL3q_nztXO9sn5bexcXM5-z8EGNoF_mvt0ZZZgWstvftff0_ewHvjLPn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614504162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When Nonsense Sounds Happy or Helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PsycARTICLES</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Quirin, Markus ; Kazén, Miguel ; Kuhl, Julius</creator><contributor>Carver, Charles S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Quirin, Markus ; Kazén, Miguel ; Kuhl, Julius ; Carver, Charles S</creatorcontrib><description>This article introduces an instrument for the indirect assessment of positive and negative affect, the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). This test draws on participant ratings of the extent to which artificial words subjectively convey various emotions. Factor analyses of these ratings yielded two independent factors that can be interpreted as implicit positive and negative affect. The corresponding scales show adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, stability (Study 1), and construct validity (Study 2). Studies 3 and 4 demonstrate that the IPANAT also measures state variance. Finally, Study 5 provides criterion-based validity by demonstrating that correlations between implicit affect and explicit affect are higher under conditions of spontaneous responding than under conditions of reflective responding to explicit affect scales. The present findings suggest that the IPANAT is a reliable and valid measure with a straightforward application procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0016063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19686004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Affect ; Assessment ; Biological and medical sciences ; Construct Validity ; Discriminant analysis ; Emotional States ; Emotions ; Factor analysis ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Happiness ; Helplessness, Learned ; Human ; Humans ; Judgment ; Male ; Mood ; Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data ; Personality Measures ; Psychological tests ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data ; Semantics ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social psychology ; Sociological research ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity ; Test-Retest reliability ; Validation studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 2009-09, Vol.97 (3), p.500-516</ispartof><rights>2009 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Sep 2009</rights><rights>2009, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-9842e3c47534cafa5c29c8b530daeb447142585fed12c15f671c4eed462541983</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-4106-461X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30978,30979,33202,33203,33753</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21829581$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19686004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Carver, Charles S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Quirin, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazén, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhl, Julius</creatorcontrib><title>When Nonsense Sounds Happy or Helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>This article introduces an instrument for the indirect assessment of positive and negative affect, the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). This test draws on participant ratings of the extent to which artificial words subjectively convey various emotions. Factor analyses of these ratings yielded two independent factors that can be interpreted as implicit positive and negative affect. The corresponding scales show adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, stability (Study 1), and construct validity (Study 2). Studies 3 and 4 demonstrate that the IPANAT also measures state variance. Finally, Study 5 provides criterion-based validity by demonstrating that correlations between implicit affect and explicit affect are higher under conditions of spontaneous responding than under conditions of reflective responding to explicit affect scales. The present findings suggest that the IPANAT is a reliable and valid measure with a straightforward application procedure.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Emotional States</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Helplessness, Learned</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mood</subject><subject>Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Personality Measures</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Sociological research</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Test-Retest reliability</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V1LHDEUBuBQlO5WBX-BDKV-gIw9J9-5FGldQfRCpZchm8nQldmZabJzsf_eLLu1VGSFQEh4OJxzXkIOES4QmPruAFCCZJ_IGA0zJTIUO2QMQGnJBPIR-ZLSMwBwQelnMkIjtcyvMTn59Tu0xV3XppBP8dANbZWKiev7ZdHFYhKavgkp7ZPd2jUpHGzuPfL088fj1aS8vb--ubq8LR03bFEazWlgnivBuHe1E54ar6eCQeXClHOFnAot6lAh9ShqqdDzECouqeBoNNsjp-u6fez-DCEt7HyWfGga14ZuSFZxqlDn3rM82SqlEiZPyD-ELBdkoDDDr2_gczfENo9rJXIBHCXdhigYDVoKkdHZGvnYpRRDbfs4m7u4tAh2FZj9G1imR5t6w3Qeqn9wk1AGxxvgkndNHV3rZ-nVUdTUCL3q_nztXO9sn5bexcXM5-z8EGNoF_mvt0ZZZgWstvftff0_ewHvjLPn</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Quirin, Markus</creator><creator>Kazén, Miguel</creator><creator>Kuhl, Julius</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4106-461X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>When Nonsense Sounds Happy or Helpless</title><author>Quirin, Markus ; Kazén, Miguel ; Kuhl, Julius</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-9842e3c47534cafa5c29c8b530daeb447142585fed12c15f671c4eed462541983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Emotional States</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Helplessness, Learned</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mood</topic><topic>Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Personality Measures</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Sociological research</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Test-Retest reliability</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quirin, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazén, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhl, Julius</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quirin, Markus</au><au>Kazén, Miguel</au><au>Kuhl, Julius</au><au>Carver, Charles S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When Nonsense Sounds Happy or Helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>500</spage><epage>516</epage><pages>500-516</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>This article introduces an instrument for the indirect assessment of positive and negative affect, the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). This test draws on participant ratings of the extent to which artificial words subjectively convey various emotions. Factor analyses of these ratings yielded two independent factors that can be interpreted as implicit positive and negative affect. The corresponding scales show adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, stability (Study 1), and construct validity (Study 2). Studies 3 and 4 demonstrate that the IPANAT also measures state variance. Finally, Study 5 provides criterion-based validity by demonstrating that correlations between implicit affect and explicit affect are higher under conditions of spontaneous responding than under conditions of reflective responding to explicit affect scales. The present findings suggest that the IPANAT is a reliable and valid measure with a straightforward application procedure.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>19686004</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0016063</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4106-461X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-3514 |
ispartof | Journal of personality and social psychology, 2009-09, Vol.97 (3), p.500-516 |
issn | 0022-3514 1939-1315 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_742718860 |
source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PsycARTICLES; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Adolescent Affect Assessment Biological and medical sciences Construct Validity Discriminant analysis Emotional States Emotions Factor analysis Female Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Happiness Helplessness, Learned Human Humans Judgment Male Mood Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data Personality Measures Psychological tests Psychology Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry Psychology. Psychophysiology Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data Semantics Sensitivity and Specificity Social attribution, perception and cognition Social psychology Sociological research Test Reliability Test Validity Test-Retest reliability Validation studies Young Adult |
title | When Nonsense Sounds Happy or Helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT) |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T13%3A22%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20Nonsense%20Sounds%20Happy%20or%20Helpless:%20The%20Implicit%20Positive%20and%20Negative%20Affect%20Test%20(IPANAT)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Quirin,%20Markus&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=500&rft.epage=516&rft.pages=500-516&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0016063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67590044%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-9842e3c47534cafa5c29c8b530daeb447142585fed12c15f671c4eed462541983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614504162&rft_id=info:pmid/19686004&rfr_iscdi=true |