Loading…

When Nonsense Sounds Happy or Helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)

This article introduces an instrument for the indirect assessment of positive and negative affect, the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). This test draws on participant ratings of the extent to which artificial words subjectively convey various emotions. Factor analyses of these ra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of personality and social psychology 2009-09, Vol.97 (3), p.500-516
Main Authors: Quirin, Markus, Kazén, Miguel, Kuhl, Julius
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-9842e3c47534cafa5c29c8b530daeb447142585fed12c15f671c4eed462541983
cites
container_end_page 516
container_issue 3
container_start_page 500
container_title Journal of personality and social psychology
container_volume 97
creator Quirin, Markus
Kazén, Miguel
Kuhl, Julius
description This article introduces an instrument for the indirect assessment of positive and negative affect, the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). This test draws on participant ratings of the extent to which artificial words subjectively convey various emotions. Factor analyses of these ratings yielded two independent factors that can be interpreted as implicit positive and negative affect. The corresponding scales show adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, stability (Study 1), and construct validity (Study 2). Studies 3 and 4 demonstrate that the IPANAT also measures state variance. Finally, Study 5 provides criterion-based validity by demonstrating that correlations between implicit affect and explicit affect are higher under conditions of spontaneous responding than under conditions of reflective responding to explicit affect scales. The present findings suggest that the IPANAT is a reliable and valid measure with a straightforward application procedure.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/a0016063
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_742718860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>67590044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-9842e3c47534cafa5c29c8b530daeb447142585fed12c15f671c4eed462541983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0V1LHDEUBuBQlO5WBX-BDKV-gIw9J9-5FGldQfRCpZchm8nQldmZabJzsf_eLLu1VGSFQEh4OJxzXkIOES4QmPruAFCCZJ_IGA0zJTIUO2QMQGnJBPIR-ZLSMwBwQelnMkIjtcyvMTn59Tu0xV3XppBP8dANbZWKiev7ZdHFYhKavgkp7ZPd2jUpHGzuPfL088fj1aS8vb--ubq8LR03bFEazWlgnivBuHe1E54ar6eCQeXClHOFnAot6lAh9ShqqdDzECouqeBoNNsjp-u6fez-DCEt7HyWfGga14ZuSFZxqlDn3rM82SqlEiZPyD-ELBdkoDDDr2_gczfENo9rJXIBHCXdhigYDVoKkdHZGvnYpRRDbfs4m7u4tAh2FZj9G1imR5t6w3Qeqn9wk1AGxxvgkndNHV3rZ-nVUdTUCL3q_nztXO9sn5bexcXM5-z8EGNoF_mvt0ZZZgWstvftff0_ewHvjLPn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>614504162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When Nonsense Sounds Happy or Helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>PsycARTICLES</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Quirin, Markus ; Kazén, Miguel ; Kuhl, Julius</creator><contributor>Carver, Charles S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Quirin, Markus ; Kazén, Miguel ; Kuhl, Julius ; Carver, Charles S</creatorcontrib><description>This article introduces an instrument for the indirect assessment of positive and negative affect, the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). This test draws on participant ratings of the extent to which artificial words subjectively convey various emotions. Factor analyses of these ratings yielded two independent factors that can be interpreted as implicit positive and negative affect. The corresponding scales show adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, stability (Study 1), and construct validity (Study 2). Studies 3 and 4 demonstrate that the IPANAT also measures state variance. Finally, Study 5 provides criterion-based validity by demonstrating that correlations between implicit affect and explicit affect are higher under conditions of spontaneous responding than under conditions of reflective responding to explicit affect scales. The present findings suggest that the IPANAT is a reliable and valid measure with a straightforward application procedure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-3514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-1315</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/a0016063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 19686004</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JPSPB2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Affect ; Assessment ; Biological and medical sciences ; Construct Validity ; Discriminant analysis ; Emotional States ; Emotions ; Factor analysis ; Female ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Happiness ; Helplessness, Learned ; Human ; Humans ; Judgment ; Male ; Mood ; Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Personality Measures ; Psychological tests ; Psychology ; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry ; Psychology. Psychophysiology ; Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Semantics ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Social attribution, perception and cognition ; Social psychology ; Sociological research ; Test Reliability ; Test Validity ; Test-Retest reliability ; Validation studies ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of personality and social psychology, 2009-09, Vol.97 (3), p.500-516</ispartof><rights>2009 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>(c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Sep 2009</rights><rights>2009, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-9842e3c47534cafa5c29c8b530daeb447142585fed12c15f671c4eed462541983</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-4106-461X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,30978,30979,33202,33203,33753</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=21829581$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19686004$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Carver, Charles S</contributor><creatorcontrib>Quirin, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazén, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhl, Julius</creatorcontrib><title>When Nonsense Sounds Happy or Helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)</title><title>Journal of personality and social psychology</title><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><description>This article introduces an instrument for the indirect assessment of positive and negative affect, the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). This test draws on participant ratings of the extent to which artificial words subjectively convey various emotions. Factor analyses of these ratings yielded two independent factors that can be interpreted as implicit positive and negative affect. The corresponding scales show adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, stability (Study 1), and construct validity (Study 2). Studies 3 and 4 demonstrate that the IPANAT also measures state variance. Finally, Study 5 provides criterion-based validity by demonstrating that correlations between implicit affect and explicit affect are higher under conditions of spontaneous responding than under conditions of reflective responding to explicit affect scales. The present findings suggest that the IPANAT is a reliable and valid measure with a straightforward application procedure.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Discriminant analysis</subject><subject>Emotional States</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Happiness</subject><subject>Helplessness, Learned</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mood</subject><subject>Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Personality Measures</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</subject><subject>Psychology. Psychophysiology</subject><subject>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Social attribution, perception and cognition</subject><subject>Social psychology</subject><subject>Sociological research</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Test-Retest reliability</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0022-3514</issn><issn>1939-1315</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0V1LHDEUBuBQlO5WBX-BDKV-gIw9J9-5FGldQfRCpZchm8nQldmZabJzsf_eLLu1VGSFQEh4OJxzXkIOES4QmPruAFCCZJ_IGA0zJTIUO2QMQGnJBPIR-ZLSMwBwQelnMkIjtcyvMTn59Tu0xV3XppBP8dANbZWKiev7ZdHFYhKavgkp7ZPd2jUpHGzuPfL088fj1aS8vb--ubq8LR03bFEazWlgnivBuHe1E54ar6eCQeXClHOFnAot6lAh9ShqqdDzECouqeBoNNsjp-u6fez-DCEt7HyWfGga14ZuSFZxqlDn3rM82SqlEiZPyD-ELBdkoDDDr2_gczfENo9rJXIBHCXdhigYDVoKkdHZGvnYpRRDbfs4m7u4tAh2FZj9G1imR5t6w3Qeqn9wk1AGxxvgkndNHV3rZ-nVUdTUCL3q_nztXO9sn5bexcXM5-z8EGNoF_mvt0ZZZgWstvftff0_ewHvjLPn</recordid><startdate>20090901</startdate><enddate>20090901</enddate><creator>Quirin, Markus</creator><creator>Kazén, Miguel</creator><creator>Kuhl, Julius</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4106-461X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20090901</creationdate><title>When Nonsense Sounds Happy or Helpless</title><author>Quirin, Markus ; Kazén, Miguel ; Kuhl, Julius</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-9842e3c47534cafa5c29c8b530daeb447142585fed12c15f671c4eed462541983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Discriminant analysis</topic><topic>Emotional States</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Happiness</topic><topic>Helplessness, Learned</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mood</topic><topic>Personality Assessment - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Personality Measures</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry</topic><topic>Psychology. Psychophysiology</topic><topic>Psychometrics - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Social attribution, perception and cognition</topic><topic>Social psychology</topic><topic>Sociological research</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Test-Retest reliability</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Quirin, Markus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kazén, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuhl, Julius</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Quirin, Markus</au><au>Kazén, Miguel</au><au>Kuhl, Julius</au><au>Carver, Charles S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>When Nonsense Sounds Happy or Helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)</atitle><jtitle>Journal of personality and social psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Pers Soc Psychol</addtitle><date>2009-09-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>500</spage><epage>516</epage><pages>500-516</pages><issn>0022-3514</issn><eissn>1939-1315</eissn><coden>JPSPB2</coden><abstract>This article introduces an instrument for the indirect assessment of positive and negative affect, the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT). This test draws on participant ratings of the extent to which artificial words subjectively convey various emotions. Factor analyses of these ratings yielded two independent factors that can be interpreted as implicit positive and negative affect. The corresponding scales show adequate internal consistency, test-retest reliability, stability (Study 1), and construct validity (Study 2). Studies 3 and 4 demonstrate that the IPANAT also measures state variance. Finally, Study 5 provides criterion-based validity by demonstrating that correlations between implicit affect and explicit affect are higher under conditions of spontaneous responding than under conditions of reflective responding to explicit affect scales. The present findings suggest that the IPANAT is a reliable and valid measure with a straightforward application procedure.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>19686004</pmid><doi>10.1037/a0016063</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4106-461X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-3514
ispartof Journal of personality and social psychology, 2009-09, Vol.97 (3), p.500-516
issn 0022-3514
1939-1315
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_742718860
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); PsycARTICLES; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Adolescent
Affect
Assessment
Biological and medical sciences
Construct Validity
Discriminant analysis
Emotional States
Emotions
Factor analysis
Female
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Happiness
Helplessness, Learned
Human
Humans
Judgment
Male
Mood
Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data
Personality Measures
Psychological tests
Psychology
Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry
Psychology. Psychophysiology
Psychometrics - statistics & numerical data
Semantics
Sensitivity and Specificity
Social attribution, perception and cognition
Social psychology
Sociological research
Test Reliability
Test Validity
Test-Retest reliability
Validation studies
Young Adult
title When Nonsense Sounds Happy or Helpless: The Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T13%3A22%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=When%20Nonsense%20Sounds%20Happy%20or%20Helpless:%20The%20Implicit%20Positive%20and%20Negative%20Affect%20Test%20(IPANAT)&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20personality%20and%20social%20psychology&rft.au=Quirin,%20Markus&rft.date=2009-09-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=500&rft.epage=516&rft.pages=500-516&rft.issn=0022-3514&rft.eissn=1939-1315&rft.coden=JPSPB2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/a0016063&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E67590044%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a493t-9842e3c47534cafa5c29c8b530daeb447142585fed12c15f671c4eed462541983%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=614504162&rft_id=info:pmid/19686004&rfr_iscdi=true