Loading…
Spatial neighborhood based anomaly detection in sensor datasets
Success of anomaly detection, similar to other spatial data mining techniques, relies on neighborhood definition. In this paper, we argue that the anomalous behavior of spatial objects in a neighborhood can be truly captured when both (a) spatial autocorrelation (similar behavior of nearby objects d...
Saved in:
Published in: | Data mining and knowledge discovery 2010-03, Vol.20 (2), p.221-258 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Success of anomaly detection, similar to other spatial data mining techniques, relies on neighborhood definition. In this paper, we argue that the anomalous behavior of spatial objects in a neighborhood can be truly captured when both (a)
spatial autocorrelation
(similar behavior of nearby objects due to proximity) and (b)
spatial heterogeneity
(distinct behavior of nearby objects due to difference in the underlying processes in the region) are taken into consideration for the neighborhood definition. Our approach begins by generating
micro neighborhoods
around spatial objects encompassing all the information about a spatial object. We selectively merge these based on
spatial relationships
accounting for autocorrelation and
inferential relationships
accounting for heterogeneity, forming
macro neighborhoods
. In such neighborhoods, we then identify (i)
spatio-temporal outliers
, where individual sensor readings are anomalous, (ii)
spatial outliers
, where the entire sensor is an anomaly, and (iii)
spatio-temporally coalesced outliers
, where a group of spatio-temporal outliers in the macro neighborhood are separated by a small time lag indicating the traversal of the anomaly. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in neighborhood formation and anomaly detection with experimental results in (i) water monitoring and (ii) highway traffic monitoring sensor datasets. We also compare the results of our approach with an existing approach for spatial anomaly detection. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1384-5810 1573-756X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10618-009-0147-0 |