Loading…
Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching
Effective camouflage renders a target indistinguishable from irrelevant background objects. Two interrelated but logically distinct mechanisms for this are background pattern matching (crypsis 1 , 2 ) and disruptive coloration: in the former, the animal's colours are a random sample of the back...
Saved in:
Published in: | Nature (London) 2005-03, Vol.434 (7029), p.72-74 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Effective camouflage renders a target indistinguishable from irrelevant background objects. Two interrelated but logically distinct mechanisms for this are background pattern matching (crypsis
1
,
2
) and disruptive coloration: in the former, the animal's colours are a random sample of the background
1
,
2
; in the latter, bold contrasting colours on the animal's periphery break up its outline. The latter has long been proposed as an explanation for some apparently conspicuous coloration in animals
3
,
4
, and is standard textbook material. Surprisingly, only one quantitative test
5
of the theory exists, and one experimental test of its effectiveness against non-human predators
6
. Here we test two key predictions: that patterns on the body's outline should be particularly effective in promoting concealment and that highly contrasting colours should enhance this disruptive effect. Artificial moth-like targets were exposed to bird predation in the field, with the experimental colour patterns on the ‘wings’ and a dead mealworm as the edible ‘body’. Survival analysis supported the predictions, indicating that disruptive coloration is an effective means of camouflage, above and beyond background pattern matching. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-0836 1476-4687 |
DOI: | 10.1038/nature03312 |