Loading…

Using Nonfinancial Measures to Assess Fraud Risk

This study examines whether auditors can effectively use nonfinancial measures (NFMs) to assess the reasonableness of financial performance and, thereby, help detect financial statement fraud (hereafter, fraud). If auditors or other interested parties (e. g., directors, lenders, investors, or regula...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of accounting research 2009-12, Vol.47 (5), p.1135-1166
Main Authors: BRAZEL, JOSEPH F., JONES, KEITH L., ZIMBELMAN, MARK F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This study examines whether auditors can effectively use nonfinancial measures (NFMs) to assess the reasonableness of financial performance and, thereby, help detect financial statement fraud (hereafter, fraud). If auditors or other interested parties (e. g., directors, lenders, investors, or regulators) can identify NFMs (e. g., facilities growth) that are correlated with financial measures (e. g., revenue growth), inconsistent patterns between the NFMs and financial measures can be used to detect firms with high fraud risk. We find that the difference between financial and nonfinancial performance is significantly greater for firms that committed fraud than for their nonfraud competitors. We also find that this difference is a significant fraud indicator when included in a model containing variables that have previously been linked to the likelihood of fraud. Overall, our results provide empirical evidence suggesting that NFMs can be effectively used to assess fraud risk.
ISSN:0021-8456
1475-679X
DOI:10.1111/j.1475-679X.2009.00349.x