Disaggregated data and trade policy analysis: The value of linking partial and general equilibrium models

• Published in: Economic modelling 2010-05, Vol.27 (3), p.755-766
• Main Authors: Narayanan, Badri G., Hertel, Thomas W., Horridge, J. Mark
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Applied general equilibrium models; Auto industry; Automobile industry; Case studies; CGE modeling; CGE modeling Trade policy Partial Equilibrium India Auto industry; Domestic market; Economic models; Elasticity; Equilibrium; India; Liberalization; Partial Equilibrium; Reform; Studies; Tariffs; Trade liberalization; Trade policy
• ISSN: 0264-9993; 1873-6122
• DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2010.01.018

Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) models are now routinely utilized for the evaluation of trade policy reforms, yet they are typically quite highly aggregated, which limits their usefulness to trade negotiators who are often interested in impacts at the tariff line. On the other hand, Partial Equilibrium (PE) models, which are typically used for analysis at disaggregate levels, deprive the researcher of the benefits of an economy-wide analysis, which is required to examine the overall impact of broad-based trade policy reforms. Therefore, a PE–GE, nested modeling framework has the prospect of offering an ideal tool for trade policy analysis. In this paper, we develop a PE model that captures international trade, domestic consumption and output, using Constant Elasticity of Transformation (CET) and Constant Elasticity of Substitution (CES) structures, market clearing conditions and price linkages, nested within the standard GTAP model. In particular, we extend the welfare decomposition of Huff and Hertel (2001) to this PE–GE model in order to contrast the sources of welfare gain in PE and GE analyses. To illustrate the usefulness of this model, we examine the contentious issue of tariff liberalization in the Indian auto sector, using PE, GE and PE–GE models. Both the PE and PE–GE models show that the imports of motorcycles and automobiles change drastically with both unilateral and bilateral tariff liberalization by India, but the PE model does a poor job predicting the overall size and price level in the industry, post-liberalization. On the other hand, the GE model overestimates substitution between regional suppliers due to “false competition” and underestimates the welfare gain, due to the problem of tariff averaging in the aggregated model. These findings are shown to be robust to wide variation in model parameters. We conclude that the linked model is superior to both the GE and PE counterparts.