Loading…

I'm not gonna hit a lady': Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men's denials of violence towards women

This article examines the way male suspects deny accusations of assaulting women in interrogations by police officers. It draws on a large corpus of British police interrogation materials, and uses conversation analysis to shed light on the location and design of, and responses to, suspects' &#...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Discourse & society 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.59-82
Main Author: Stokoe, Elizabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-58a40207f701776d54b6212bf9355c164b468fb1eb64ecd9e6ef2ce2e2f486d93
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-58a40207f701776d54b6212bf9355c164b468fb1eb64ecd9e6ef2ce2e2f486d93
container_end_page 82
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
container_title Discourse & society
container_volume 21
creator Stokoe, Elizabeth
description This article examines the way male suspects deny accusations of assaulting women in interrogations by police officers. It draws on a large corpus of British police interrogation materials, and uses conversation analysis to shed light on the location and design of, and responses to, suspects' ' category-based denials' that they are not 'the kind of men who hit women'. Two sections of analysis identify how, first, such denials routinely follow police officers' direct questions about violent behaviour, and, second, how they become embedded in extended narratives that are not directly describing violence. In contrast to other discourse-analytic studies of men's accounts of violence towards women, the article unpacks the component features that comprise what others might label grossly as the 'discourse of gendered violence'. Rather than see how such 'discourses' operate in interview contexts, it shows how suspects construct, in a high-stakes setting for a particular purpose, different categories of men, claiming membership in one (who do not hit women) by recruiting the notion of the other (who do). Thus, in addition to its contribution to the study of gender and violence, the article takes new steps in the ongoing development of membership categorization and conversation analysis, showcasing a type of systematic sequential analysis that can be done with membership categories.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0957926509345072
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744446680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42889304</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0957926509345072</sage_id><sourcerecordid>42889304</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-58a40207f701776d54b6212bf9355c164b468fb1eb64ecd9e6ef2ce2e2f486d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0d1L5DAQAPAgJ7invvtyEDi4fbGapPlo7k0WPxYWfPGeS9pO1yxtspd0Xda_3pQ9RQQP8zKQ-c3AzCB0RskFpUpdEi2UZlIQnXNBFDtAE8olyXLJ-Dc0GdPZmD9C32NcEUIY12yCtvNpj50f8NI7Z_CjHbDBnWl209945t0ThGgG6x02znS7aOM57qGv0vejXePaDLD0wT6_miZl3TTiBpw1XcS-xU_Wd-BqwIPfmtBEvPXJnKDDNgE4_ReP0Z-b64fZXba4v53PrhZZzWUxZKIwnDCiWkXSkLIRvJKMsqrVuRA1lbxKrK0oVJJD3WiQ0LIaGLCWF7LR-TGa7vuug_-7gTiUvY01dJ1x4DexVDw9KQvyBZkTLphSSf76r8xVnvYrR_jzA1z5TUiLjCXVrGBMcSKSIntVBx9jgLZcB9ubsCspKcfblh9vm0qyfUk0S3jX9HP_Y-9XcfDhrT9nRaHTVPkL8dWsUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928227405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>I'm not gonna hit a lady': Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men's denials of violence towards women</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Stokoe, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Stokoe, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the way male suspects deny accusations of assaulting women in interrogations by police officers. It draws on a large corpus of British police interrogation materials, and uses conversation analysis to shed light on the location and design of, and responses to, suspects' ' category-based denials' that they are not 'the kind of men who hit women'. Two sections of analysis identify how, first, such denials routinely follow police officers' direct questions about violent behaviour, and, second, how they become embedded in extended narratives that are not directly describing violence. In contrast to other discourse-analytic studies of men's accounts of violence towards women, the article unpacks the component features that comprise what others might label grossly as the 'discourse of gendered violence'. Rather than see how such 'discourses' operate in interview contexts, it shows how suspects construct, in a high-stakes setting for a particular purpose, different categories of men, claiming membership in one (who do not hit women) by recruiting the notion of the other (who do). Thus, in addition to its contribution to the study of gender and violence, the article takes new steps in the ongoing development of membership categorization and conversation analysis, showcasing a type of systematic sequential analysis that can be done with membership categories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0957926509345072</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DISOEN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Assault ; Classification ; Conversation ; Conversation analysis ; Corpus analysis ; Criminal arrests ; Discourse analysis ; Discourses ; Domestic violence ; Females ; Gender ; Gender-based violence ; Interrogations ; Membership ; Men ; Police ; Policing ; Questioning ; Recruitment ; Research Responses ; Sequential analysis ; Sexual violence ; Social interaction ; United Kingdom ; Violence ; Violence against women ; Violent crimes ; Women</subject><ispartof>Discourse &amp; society, 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.59-82</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 SAGE Publications Ltd.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-58a40207f701776d54b6212bf9355c164b468fb1eb64ecd9e6ef2ce2e2f486d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-58a40207f701776d54b6212bf9355c164b468fb1eb64ecd9e6ef2ce2e2f486d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42889304$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42889304$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31269,31270,33223,33224,33774,33775,58238,58471,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stokoe, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>I'm not gonna hit a lady': Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men's denials of violence towards women</title><title>Discourse &amp; society</title><description>This article examines the way male suspects deny accusations of assaulting women in interrogations by police officers. It draws on a large corpus of British police interrogation materials, and uses conversation analysis to shed light on the location and design of, and responses to, suspects' ' category-based denials' that they are not 'the kind of men who hit women'. Two sections of analysis identify how, first, such denials routinely follow police officers' direct questions about violent behaviour, and, second, how they become embedded in extended narratives that are not directly describing violence. In contrast to other discourse-analytic studies of men's accounts of violence towards women, the article unpacks the component features that comprise what others might label grossly as the 'discourse of gendered violence'. Rather than see how such 'discourses' operate in interview contexts, it shows how suspects construct, in a high-stakes setting for a particular purpose, different categories of men, claiming membership in one (who do not hit women) by recruiting the notion of the other (who do). Thus, in addition to its contribution to the study of gender and violence, the article takes new steps in the ongoing development of membership categorization and conversation analysis, showcasing a type of systematic sequential analysis that can be done with membership categories.</description><subject>Assault</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Conversation</subject><subject>Conversation analysis</subject><subject>Corpus analysis</subject><subject>Criminal arrests</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Discourses</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender-based violence</subject><subject>Interrogations</subject><subject>Membership</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Policing</subject><subject>Questioning</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Research Responses</subject><subject>Sequential analysis</subject><subject>Sexual violence</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Violence against women</subject><subject>Violent crimes</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0957-9265</issn><issn>1460-3624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0d1L5DAQAPAgJ7invvtyEDi4fbGapPlo7k0WPxYWfPGeS9pO1yxtspd0Xda_3pQ9RQQP8zKQ-c3AzCB0RskFpUpdEi2UZlIQnXNBFDtAE8olyXLJ-Dc0GdPZmD9C32NcEUIY12yCtvNpj50f8NI7Z_CjHbDBnWl209945t0ThGgG6x02znS7aOM57qGv0vejXePaDLD0wT6_miZl3TTiBpw1XcS-xU_Wd-BqwIPfmtBEvPXJnKDDNgE4_ReP0Z-b64fZXba4v53PrhZZzWUxZKIwnDCiWkXSkLIRvJKMsqrVuRA1lbxKrK0oVJJD3WiQ0LIaGLCWF7LR-TGa7vuug_-7gTiUvY01dJ1x4DexVDw9KQvyBZkTLphSSf76r8xVnvYrR_jzA1z5TUiLjCXVrGBMcSKSIntVBx9jgLZcB9ubsCspKcfblh9vm0qyfUk0S3jX9HP_Y-9XcfDhrT9nRaHTVPkL8dWsUQ</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Stokoe, Elizabeth</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>I'm not gonna hit a lady': Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men's denials of violence towards women</title><author>Stokoe, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-58a40207f701776d54b6212bf9355c164b468fb1eb64ecd9e6ef2ce2e2f486d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Assault</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Conversation</topic><topic>Conversation analysis</topic><topic>Corpus analysis</topic><topic>Criminal arrests</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Discourses</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender-based violence</topic><topic>Interrogations</topic><topic>Membership</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Policing</topic><topic>Questioning</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Research Responses</topic><topic>Sequential analysis</topic><topic>Sexual violence</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Violence against women</topic><topic>Violent crimes</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stokoe, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Discourse &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stokoe, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>I'm not gonna hit a lady': Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men's denials of violence towards women</atitle><jtitle>Discourse &amp; society</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>59-82</pages><issn>0957-9265</issn><eissn>1460-3624</eissn><coden>DISOEN</coden><abstract>This article examines the way male suspects deny accusations of assaulting women in interrogations by police officers. It draws on a large corpus of British police interrogation materials, and uses conversation analysis to shed light on the location and design of, and responses to, suspects' ' category-based denials' that they are not 'the kind of men who hit women'. Two sections of analysis identify how, first, such denials routinely follow police officers' direct questions about violent behaviour, and, second, how they become embedded in extended narratives that are not directly describing violence. In contrast to other discourse-analytic studies of men's accounts of violence towards women, the article unpacks the component features that comprise what others might label grossly as the 'discourse of gendered violence'. Rather than see how such 'discourses' operate in interview contexts, it shows how suspects construct, in a high-stakes setting for a particular purpose, different categories of men, claiming membership in one (who do not hit women) by recruiting the notion of the other (who do). Thus, in addition to its contribution to the study of gender and violence, the article takes new steps in the ongoing development of membership categorization and conversation analysis, showcasing a type of systematic sequential analysis that can be done with membership categories.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0957926509345072</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-9265
ispartof Discourse & society, 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.59-82
issn 0957-9265
1460-3624
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744446680
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Sociological Abstracts; SAGE
subjects Assault
Classification
Conversation
Conversation analysis
Corpus analysis
Criminal arrests
Discourse analysis
Discourses
Domestic violence
Females
Gender
Gender-based violence
Interrogations
Membership
Men
Police
Policing
Questioning
Recruitment
Research Responses
Sequential analysis
Sexual violence
Social interaction
United Kingdom
Violence
Violence against women
Violent crimes
Women
title I'm not gonna hit a lady': Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men's denials of violence towards women
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A45%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=I'm%20not%20gonna%20hit%20a%20lady':%20Conversation%20analysis,%20membership%20categorization%20and%20men's%20denials%20of%20violence%20towards%20women&rft.jtitle=Discourse%20&%20society&rft.au=Stokoe,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=59-82&rft.issn=0957-9265&rft.eissn=1460-3624&rft.coden=DISOEN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0957926509345072&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42889304%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-58a40207f701776d54b6212bf9355c164b468fb1eb64ecd9e6ef2ce2e2f486d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928227405&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42889304&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0957926509345072&rfr_iscdi=true