Loading…
I'm not gonna hit a lady': Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men's denials of violence towards women
This article examines the way male suspects deny accusations of assaulting women in interrogations by police officers. It draws on a large corpus of British police interrogation materials, and uses conversation analysis to shed light on the location and design of, and responses to, suspects' ...
Saved in:
Published in: | Discourse & society 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.59-82 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-58a40207f701776d54b6212bf9355c164b468fb1eb64ecd9e6ef2ce2e2f486d93 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-58a40207f701776d54b6212bf9355c164b468fb1eb64ecd9e6ef2ce2e2f486d93 |
container_end_page | 82 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Discourse & society |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Stokoe, Elizabeth |
description | This article examines the way male suspects deny accusations of assaulting women in interrogations by police officers. It draws on a large corpus of British police interrogation materials, and uses conversation analysis to shed light on the location and design of, and responses to, suspects' ' category-based denials' that they are not 'the kind of men who hit women'. Two sections of analysis identify how, first, such denials routinely follow police officers' direct questions about violent behaviour, and, second, how they become embedded in extended narratives that are not directly describing violence. In contrast to other discourse-analytic studies of men's accounts of violence towards women, the article unpacks the component features that comprise what others might label grossly as the 'discourse of gendered violence'. Rather than see how such 'discourses' operate in interview contexts, it shows how suspects construct, in a high-stakes setting for a particular purpose, different categories of men, claiming membership in one (who do not hit women) by recruiting the notion of the other (who do). Thus, in addition to its contribution to the study of gender and violence, the article takes new steps in the ongoing development of membership categorization and conversation analysis, showcasing a type of systematic sequential analysis that can be done with membership categories. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0957926509345072 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744446680</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>42889304</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_0957926509345072</sage_id><sourcerecordid>42889304</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-58a40207f701776d54b6212bf9355c164b468fb1eb64ecd9e6ef2ce2e2f486d93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0d1L5DAQAPAgJ7invvtyEDi4fbGapPlo7k0WPxYWfPGeS9pO1yxtspd0Xda_3pQ9RQQP8zKQ-c3AzCB0RskFpUpdEi2UZlIQnXNBFDtAE8olyXLJ-Dc0GdPZmD9C32NcEUIY12yCtvNpj50f8NI7Z_CjHbDBnWl209945t0ThGgG6x02znS7aOM57qGv0vejXePaDLD0wT6_miZl3TTiBpw1XcS-xU_Wd-BqwIPfmtBEvPXJnKDDNgE4_ReP0Z-b64fZXba4v53PrhZZzWUxZKIwnDCiWkXSkLIRvJKMsqrVuRA1lbxKrK0oVJJD3WiQ0LIaGLCWF7LR-TGa7vuug_-7gTiUvY01dJ1x4DexVDw9KQvyBZkTLphSSf76r8xVnvYrR_jzA1z5TUiLjCXVrGBMcSKSIntVBx9jgLZcB9ubsCspKcfblh9vm0qyfUk0S3jX9HP_Y-9XcfDhrT9nRaHTVPkL8dWsUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1928227405</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>I'm not gonna hit a lady': Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men's denials of violence towards women</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Stokoe, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Stokoe, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the way male suspects deny accusations of assaulting women in interrogations by police officers. It draws on a large corpus of British police interrogation materials, and uses conversation analysis to shed light on the location and design of, and responses to, suspects' ' category-based denials' that they are not 'the kind of men who hit women'. Two sections of analysis identify how, first, such denials routinely follow police officers' direct questions about violent behaviour, and, second, how they become embedded in extended narratives that are not directly describing violence. In contrast to other discourse-analytic studies of men's accounts of violence towards women, the article unpacks the component features that comprise what others might label grossly as the 'discourse of gendered violence'. Rather than see how such 'discourses' operate in interview contexts, it shows how suspects construct, in a high-stakes setting for a particular purpose, different categories of men, claiming membership in one (who do not hit women) by recruiting the notion of the other (who do). Thus, in addition to its contribution to the study of gender and violence, the article takes new steps in the ongoing development of membership categorization and conversation analysis, showcasing a type of systematic sequential analysis that can be done with membership categories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-9265</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-3624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0957926509345072</identifier><identifier>CODEN: DISOEN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Assault ; Classification ; Conversation ; Conversation analysis ; Corpus analysis ; Criminal arrests ; Discourse analysis ; Discourses ; Domestic violence ; Females ; Gender ; Gender-based violence ; Interrogations ; Membership ; Men ; Police ; Policing ; Questioning ; Recruitment ; Research Responses ; Sequential analysis ; Sexual violence ; Social interaction ; United Kingdom ; Violence ; Violence against women ; Violent crimes ; Women</subject><ispartof>Discourse & society, 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.59-82</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 SAGE Publications Ltd.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-58a40207f701776d54b6212bf9355c164b468fb1eb64ecd9e6ef2ce2e2f486d93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-58a40207f701776d54b6212bf9355c164b468fb1eb64ecd9e6ef2ce2e2f486d93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/42889304$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/42889304$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31269,31270,33223,33224,33774,33775,58238,58471,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stokoe, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>I'm not gonna hit a lady': Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men's denials of violence towards women</title><title>Discourse & society</title><description>This article examines the way male suspects deny accusations of assaulting women in interrogations by police officers. It draws on a large corpus of British police interrogation materials, and uses conversation analysis to shed light on the location and design of, and responses to, suspects' ' category-based denials' that they are not 'the kind of men who hit women'. Two sections of analysis identify how, first, such denials routinely follow police officers' direct questions about violent behaviour, and, second, how they become embedded in extended narratives that are not directly describing violence. In contrast to other discourse-analytic studies of men's accounts of violence towards women, the article unpacks the component features that comprise what others might label grossly as the 'discourse of gendered violence'. Rather than see how such 'discourses' operate in interview contexts, it shows how suspects construct, in a high-stakes setting for a particular purpose, different categories of men, claiming membership in one (who do not hit women) by recruiting the notion of the other (who do). Thus, in addition to its contribution to the study of gender and violence, the article takes new steps in the ongoing development of membership categorization and conversation analysis, showcasing a type of systematic sequential analysis that can be done with membership categories.</description><subject>Assault</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Conversation</subject><subject>Conversation analysis</subject><subject>Corpus analysis</subject><subject>Criminal arrests</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Discourses</subject><subject>Domestic violence</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender-based violence</subject><subject>Interrogations</subject><subject>Membership</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Police</subject><subject>Policing</subject><subject>Questioning</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Research Responses</subject><subject>Sequential analysis</subject><subject>Sexual violence</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><subject>United Kingdom</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Violence against women</subject><subject>Violent crimes</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0957-9265</issn><issn>1460-3624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0d1L5DAQAPAgJ7invvtyEDi4fbGapPlo7k0WPxYWfPGeS9pO1yxtspd0Xda_3pQ9RQQP8zKQ-c3AzCB0RskFpUpdEi2UZlIQnXNBFDtAE8olyXLJ-Dc0GdPZmD9C32NcEUIY12yCtvNpj50f8NI7Z_CjHbDBnWl209945t0ThGgG6x02znS7aOM57qGv0vejXePaDLD0wT6_miZl3TTiBpw1XcS-xU_Wd-BqwIPfmtBEvPXJnKDDNgE4_ReP0Z-b64fZXba4v53PrhZZzWUxZKIwnDCiWkXSkLIRvJKMsqrVuRA1lbxKrK0oVJJD3WiQ0LIaGLCWF7LR-TGa7vuug_-7gTiUvY01dJ1x4DexVDw9KQvyBZkTLphSSf76r8xVnvYrR_jzA1z5TUiLjCXVrGBMcSKSIntVBx9jgLZcB9ubsCspKcfblh9vm0qyfUk0S3jX9HP_Y-9XcfDhrT9nRaHTVPkL8dWsUQ</recordid><startdate>20100101</startdate><enddate>20100101</enddate><creator>Stokoe, Elizabeth</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100101</creationdate><title>I'm not gonna hit a lady': Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men's denials of violence towards women</title><author>Stokoe, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-58a40207f701776d54b6212bf9355c164b468fb1eb64ecd9e6ef2ce2e2f486d93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Assault</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Conversation</topic><topic>Conversation analysis</topic><topic>Corpus analysis</topic><topic>Criminal arrests</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Discourses</topic><topic>Domestic violence</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender-based violence</topic><topic>Interrogations</topic><topic>Membership</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Police</topic><topic>Policing</topic><topic>Questioning</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Research Responses</topic><topic>Sequential analysis</topic><topic>Sexual violence</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><topic>United Kingdom</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Violence against women</topic><topic>Violent crimes</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stokoe, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Discourse & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stokoe, Elizabeth</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>I'm not gonna hit a lady': Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men's denials of violence towards women</atitle><jtitle>Discourse & society</jtitle><date>2010-01-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>82</epage><pages>59-82</pages><issn>0957-9265</issn><eissn>1460-3624</eissn><coden>DISOEN</coden><abstract>This article examines the way male suspects deny accusations of assaulting women in interrogations by police officers. It draws on a large corpus of British police interrogation materials, and uses conversation analysis to shed light on the location and design of, and responses to, suspects' ' category-based denials' that they are not 'the kind of men who hit women'. Two sections of analysis identify how, first, such denials routinely follow police officers' direct questions about violent behaviour, and, second, how they become embedded in extended narratives that are not directly describing violence. In contrast to other discourse-analytic studies of men's accounts of violence towards women, the article unpacks the component features that comprise what others might label grossly as the 'discourse of gendered violence'. Rather than see how such 'discourses' operate in interview contexts, it shows how suspects construct, in a high-stakes setting for a particular purpose, different categories of men, claiming membership in one (who do not hit women) by recruiting the notion of the other (who do). Thus, in addition to its contribution to the study of gender and violence, the article takes new steps in the ongoing development of membership categorization and conversation analysis, showcasing a type of systematic sequential analysis that can be done with membership categories.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0957926509345072</doi><tpages>24</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0957-9265 |
ispartof | Discourse & society, 2010-01, Vol.21 (1), p.59-82 |
issn | 0957-9265 1460-3624 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_744446680 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Sociological Abstracts; SAGE |
subjects | Assault Classification Conversation Conversation analysis Corpus analysis Criminal arrests Discourse analysis Discourses Domestic violence Females Gender Gender-based violence Interrogations Membership Men Police Policing Questioning Recruitment Research Responses Sequential analysis Sexual violence Social interaction United Kingdom Violence Violence against women Violent crimes Women |
title | I'm not gonna hit a lady': Conversation analysis, membership categorization and men's denials of violence towards women |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A45%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=I'm%20not%20gonna%20hit%20a%20lady':%20Conversation%20analysis,%20membership%20categorization%20and%20men's%20denials%20of%20violence%20towards%20women&rft.jtitle=Discourse%20&%20society&rft.au=Stokoe,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=2010-01-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=82&rft.pages=59-82&rft.issn=0957-9265&rft.eissn=1460-3624&rft.coden=DISOEN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0957926509345072&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E42889304%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c468t-58a40207f701776d54b6212bf9355c164b468fb1eb64ecd9e6ef2ce2e2f486d93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1928227405&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=42889304&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0957926509345072&rfr_iscdi=true |