Loading…

Impact of mountain pine beetle on the net ecosystem production of lodgepole pine stands in British Columbia

British Columbia (BC), Canada is experiencing a severe mountain pine beetle (MPB) ( Dendroctonus ponderosae) epidemic extending over an area of 135,000 km 2. The widespread mortality of lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta var. latifolia) caused by the beetle has significant implications for BC's ti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Agricultural and forest meteorology 2010-02, Vol.150 (2), p.254-264
Main Authors: Brown, M., Black, T.A., Nesic, Z., Foord, V.N., Spittlehouse, D.L., Fredeen, A.L., Grant, N.J., Burton, P.J., Trofymow, J.A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:British Columbia (BC), Canada is experiencing a severe mountain pine beetle (MPB) ( Dendroctonus ponderosae) epidemic extending over an area of 135,000 km 2. The widespread mortality of lodgepole pine ( Pinus contorta var. latifolia) caused by the beetle has significant implications for BC's timber supply and Canada's carbon (C) budget. This study used the eddy-covariance technique to examine how the beetle is impacting the net ecosystem production (NEP) of two attacked lodgepole pine-dominated stands in the central interior of BC. MPB-06 is an 83-year-old stand that was first attacked in 2006. At the start of 2007 roughly 60% of the canopy had been attacked and by October 2008 only 21% of the trees remained healthy. MPB-03, a 110-year-old stand, had >95% pine canopy mortality as a result of a 2003 beetle attack, and also differed from MPB-06 in that it had a more developed secondary structure (consisting of tree seedlings and saplings and sub-canopy and canopy trees) that survived the beetle attack. Eddy-covariance measurements were also conducted in two stands near MPB-06 harvested in 2005 and 1997 (CC-05 and CC-97) for approximately three-week periods each during the 2007 growing season. MPB-06 had an annual NEP of −82 and −33 g C m −2, while MPB-03 had an NEP of −56 and 4 g C m −2 in 2007 and 2008, respectively. In the 2007 and 2008 growing seasons (May–September), MPB-06 was a sink of 12 and 52 g C m −2, while MPB-03 was a sink of 17 and 68 g C m −2, respectively. The productivity at MPB-06 resulted from an increase in photosynthesis by the remaining healthy trees and understory vegetation, while at MPB-03 the secondary structure and understory vegetation showed a strong capacity to sequester C due to an opening up of the stand as a result of canopy mortality. Average daily values of NEP during the measurement periods at CC-97 and CC-05 were −0.37 and −0.87 g C m −2, respectively, showing that even 10 years following harvesting, these stands are likely to remain growing season C sources. That MPB-06 and MPB-03 were growing season C sinks suggests that deferring the harvest of stands with significant levels of secondary structure could prevent MPB-attacked forested areas from becoming C sources over extended periods.
ISSN:0168-1923
1873-2240
DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.11.008