Making Sequential Analysis of Environmental Monitoring Data Feasible by Simplifying the Covariance Matrix Structure

As environmental monitoring data are collected successively in time, the data are suitable for sequential analysis. An earlier article proposed a refined sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) to test against a minimal relevant trend, assuming no serial correlations and without modeling the spatia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of agricultural, biological, and environmental statistics biological, and environmental statistics, 2003-03, Vol.8 (1), p.122-137
Main Authors: Schipper, Maria, Meelis, Evert
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Correlation coefficients
Correlations
Covariance matrices
Data processing
Environmental monitoring
False negative errors
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects. Techniques
Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)
Null hypothesis
Q1
Ratio test
Sample size
Sampling
Sequential analysis
Statistical variance
Statistics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:As environmental monitoring data are collected successively in time, the data are suitable for sequential analysis. An earlier article proposed a refined sequential probability ratio test (SPRT) to test against a minimal relevant trend, assuming no serial correlations and without modeling the spatial covariance matrix. As the model parameters are unknown in advance, a minimal number of observations (nmin) is required for estimation prior to analysis. Leaving the spatial covariance matrix unstructured, nminincreases if the number of sampling locations increases. Therefore, assumptions on the spatial covariance matrix are proposed, thereby reducing the number of nuisance parameters, thus reducing nmin. This article studies three simple types of spatial covariance matrix structures and derives an adjusted SPRT for each of these types. Furthermore, we examine the robustness against deviations from the assumed spatial covariance matrix structure. Simulation studies show that adjusted SPRTs can be derived rather easily and that they are in general robust against deviations from the assumed type of spatial covariance matrix. Sequential analysis of simulated data, which are based on monitoring data of bats in the Netherlands, illustrates the use of one of the derived SPRTs.
ISSN:1085-7117
1537-2693
DOI:10.1198/1085711031238