Characterization of Pasteurellaceae-like bacteria isolated from clinically affected psittacine birds

• Published in: Journal of applied microbiology 2010-04, Vol.108 (4), p.1235-1243
• Main Authors: Gregersen, R.H, Neubauer, C, Christensen, H, Korczak, B, Bojesen, A.M, Hess, M, Bisgaard, M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Aves; Bacterial Proteins - genetics; Biological and medical sciences; Bird Diseases - microbiology; disease; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology; Health and Pathology; identification; Microbiology; Molecular Sequence Data; Pasteurella; Pasteurella Infections - microbiology; Pasteurella Infections - veterinary; Pasteurellaceae; Pasteurellaceae - classification; Pasteurellaceae - genetics; Pasteurellaceae - isolation & purification; Phenotype; Phylogeny; Psittaciformes - microbiology; psittacine birds; RNA, Ribosomal, 16S - genetics
• ISSN: 1364-5072; 1365-2672
• DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04518.x

The aim of the present investigation was to identify and characterize Pasteurella-like isolates obtained from clinically affected psittacine birds. A total of 37 isolates from psittacine birds tentatively classified with the family Pasteurellaceae were characterized phenotypically. The genetic relationship was investigated by sequencing of partial rpoB and 16S rRNA genes for selected isolates. The results obtained were compared with the data from 16 reference strains. Nine isolates were identified as Gallibacterium spp., 16 as Volucribacter spp. or Volucribacter-like, while 11 isolates were classified as taxon 44 of Bisgaard. A single isolate was identified as Pasteurella multocida. Characterization of Pasteurellaceae by traditional methods is often inconclusive because of inconsistent reactions and phenotypic diversity. For the same reason, genotyping is essential to allow proper classification as demonstrated in the present study. Limited information exists on the isolation and significance of Pasteurellaceae associated with clinically affected psittacine birds showing signs of digestive and/or respiratory disorders. The present investigations demonstrated that these organisms are widely distributed among clinically affected birds, but isolation of these taxa cannot be unambiguously correlated with the symptoms observed.