Loading…

Clinical utility of cognitive-behavioural treatment for panic disorder. results obtained in different settings: a research centre and a public mental health care unit

Cognitive‐Behavioural programmes have become the treatment of choice for Panic Disorder (PD). However, although its effectiveness has been widely demonstrated, there are still some limitations regarding the possibility of offering this type of treatment to all panic sufferers. Some researchers are s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical psychology and psychotherapy 2002-11, Vol.9 (6), p.373-383
Main Authors: García-Palacios, A., Botella, C., Robert, C., Baños, R., Perpiñá, C., Quero, S., Ballester, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Cognitive‐Behavioural programmes have become the treatment of choice for Panic Disorder (PD). However, although its effectiveness has been widely demonstrated, there are still some limitations regarding the possibility of offering this type of treatment to all panic sufferers. Some researchers are studying ways to make these programmes more available. This study deals with the application and testing of treatment programmes for PD in sites where patients usually look for help for their psychological problems, i.e. mental health care centres. Our work follows a strategy of benchmarking, and the results obtained after applying the treatment in habitual clinical contexts are compared with the results obtained after applying it in research contexts. In the present work, we analyse the possibility of ‘transporting’ a group cognitive‐behavioural programme for PD, developed in a research context, to a more natural setting, a public mental health unit. In this work we present data, using a benchmarking strategy, on one hand, on the differential effectiveness of a group cognitive‐behavioural treatment for PD applied in two different settings: a research setting—a clinical unit at the university; and a natural setting—a public mental health unit. On the other hand, we compare our results with those achieved by other studies carried out in research settings in different countries and a study carried out in a natural setting. Results indicated that our treatment was equally effective in both settings and that effectiveness was comparable to that achieved by the other studies in research and natural settings. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ISSN:1063-3995
1099-0879
DOI:10.1002/cpp.337