Loading…
Cardiovascular risk modification by community-based programs for life-style change: Comments on the Stanford study
Because of its important implications for policy decisions and research funding in the preventive health area, the objectives, methods, results, and conclusions of the Stanford 3-community study (A. J. Meyer et al; are critically examined. Both incorrect and inappropriate conclusions have been drawn...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 1980-04, Vol.48 (2), p.150-158 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Because of its important implications for policy decisions and research funding in the preventive health area, the objectives, methods, results, and conclusions of the Stanford 3-community study (A. J. Meyer et al; are critically examined. Both incorrect and inappropriate conclusions have been drawn about the effectiveness of mass media in reducing risk factors and changing life-style. The high-risk Ss in the media-only condition showed virtually no reduction in cardiovascular risk, although they did show increased knowledge about cardiovascular risk factors and did report a reduction in the consumption of cholesterol and fats. Ss in the media plus face-to-face instruction condition did reduce cardiovascular risk, primarily through smoking reduction, but because of a high drop-out rate and the absence of a face-to-face-instruction-only condition, it is impossible to evaluate the media's role in producing or maintaining the observed reduction in risk. The Stanford study was not a "community study," but a quasi-experimental study of individuals conducted in a community setting, and as such provides an incomplete and probably inappropriate model for changing unhealthy life-styles. (18 ref) |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0022-006X 1939-2117 |
DOI: | 10.1037/0022-006X.48.2.150 |