Loading…

Effect of d-amphetamine on inhibition and motor planning as a function of baseline performance

Rationale Baseline performance has been reported to predict dopamine (DA) effects on working memory, following an inverted-U pattern. This pattern may hold true for other executive functions that are DA-sensitive. Objectives The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of d -amphetamine,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychopharmacologia 2010-09, Vol.211 (4), p.423-433
Main Authors: Allman, Ava-Ann, Benkelfat, Chawki, Durand, France, Sibon, Igor, Dagher, Alain, Leyton, Marco, Baker, Glen B., O’Driscoll, Gillian A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Rationale Baseline performance has been reported to predict dopamine (DA) effects on working memory, following an inverted-U pattern. This pattern may hold true for other executive functions that are DA-sensitive. Objectives The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of d -amphetamine, an indirect DA agonist, on two other putatively DA-sensitive executive functions, inhibition and motor planning, as a function of baseline performance. Methods Participants with no prior stimulant exposure participated in a double-blind crossover study of a single dose of 0.3 mg/kg, p.o. of d -amphetamine and placebo. Participants were divided into high and low groups, based on their performance on the antisaccade and predictive saccade tasks on the baseline day. Executive functions, mood states, heart rate and blood pressure were assessed before (T0) and after drug administration, at 1.5 (T1), 2.5 (T2) and 3.5 h (T3) post-drug. Results Antisaccade errors decreased with d -amphetamine irrespective of baseline performance ( p  = 0.025). For antisaccade latency, participants who generated short-latency antisaccades at baseline had longer latencies on d -amphetamine than placebo, while those with long-latency antisaccades at baseline had shorter latencies on d -amphetamine than placebo (drug × group, p  = 0.04). d -amphetamine did not affect motor planning. Ratings of mood improved on d -amphetamine ( p  
ISSN:0033-3158
1432-2072
DOI:10.1007/s00213-010-1912-x