Loading…

Physicochemical and antioxidative properties of red and black rice varieties from Thailand, China and Sri Lanka

Nine red and three black rice varieties from Thailand, China and Sri Lanka were analysed to determine their proximate composition and their physicochemical and antioxidant properties. Four groups of rice varieties with different amylose contents were identified. Cyanidin 3-glucoside and peonoidin 3-...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Food chemistry 2011, Vol.124 (1), p.132-140
Main Authors: Sompong, R., Siebenhandl-Ehn, S., Linsberger-Martin, G., Berghofer, E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Nine red and three black rice varieties from Thailand, China and Sri Lanka were analysed to determine their proximate composition and their physicochemical and antioxidant properties. Four groups of rice varieties with different amylose contents were identified. Cyanidin 3-glucoside and peonoidin 3-glucoside were confirmed as the dominant anthocyanins in black rice varieties with contents ranging from 19.4 to 140.8 mg/100 g DM and 11.1–12.8 mg/100 g DM, respectively. Total phenolic content (TPC) differed significantly between the varieties, but not between the colours. Highest TPC was found in the red Thai rice Bahng Gawk (BG) with 691 FA equivalent mg/100 g DM, which showed as well the highest antioxidant properties. In red varieties, the major phenolic acids in the free form were ferulic, protocatechuic and vanillic acid, whereas in black varieties protocatechuic acid was dominant followed by vanillic and ferulic acid. In the bound form, ferulic acid was predominant in both colours, where contents differed significantly, followed by p-coumaric and vanillic acid. The antioxidative capacity did not differ significantly between both colours but amongst genotypes. Antioxidant capacity of rice varieties ranged within 0.9–8.1 mmol Fe(II)/100 g DM for FRAP and 2.1–12.3 mmol TEAC/100 g DM. DPPH scavenging ability ranged from 13.0% to 76.4% remaining DPPH.
ISSN:0308-8146
1873-7072
DOI:10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.05.115