Detection of postoperative neurologic deficits using somatosensory-evoked potentials alone during posterior cervical laminoplasty

• Published in: The spine journal 2010-10, Vol.10 (10), p.890-895
• Main Authors: Garcia, Ryan M., MD, Qureshi, Sheeraz A., MD, MBA, Cassinelli, Ezequiel H., MD, Biro, Christopher L., CNIM, Furey, Christopher G., MD, Bohlman, Henry H., MD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Cervical; Cervical Vertebrae; Decompression, Surgical - adverse effects; Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory - physiology; Humans; Laminectomy - adverse effects; Laminoplasty; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods; Neurophysiologic monitoring; Orthopedics; Postoperative Complications - diagnosis; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Somatosensory; Spinal Cord Diseases - surgery; Spondylosis - surgery
• ISSN: 1529-9430; 1878-1632
• DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2010.08.018

Abstract Background context The use of neurophysiologic monitoring during anterior and posterior cervical decompression procedures in patients with spondylotic myelopathy remains controversial. The ideal neurophysiologic monitoring modality of choice is also highly debated. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of neurophysiologic monitoring with only somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) in a consecutive series of laminoplasty procedures with regard to the detection of new postoperative neurologic deficits. Study design Retrospective case series. Patient sample Eighty consecutive patients who underwent a posterior cervical laminoplasty were reviewed. Outcome measures We analyzed intraoperative SSEP amplitude and latency changes from baseline with regard to the development of new postoperative neurologic deficits. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 80 patients who underwent a posterior cervical “open-door” laminoplasty with a standard SSEP neurophysiologic monitoring protocol. Intraoperative SSEP amplitude and latency changes from baseline (“alerts”) were analyzed with regard to the development of new postoperative neurologic deficits. Results Baseline SSEP values were obtained in all patients. There were five (6%) procedures that had SSEP alerts. All alerts occurred shortly after the lamina was hinged open. Four patients with SSEP alerts developed new postoperative neurologic deficits, including three unilateral upper extremity motor and sensory deficits and one complete spinal cord injury. In the immediate postoperative period, our experience with SSEP monitoring demonstrated 4 true-positive, 75 true-negative, and 1 false-positive monitoring results. Conclusions In this series of laminoplasty procedures, SSEP neurophysiologic monitoring had a high sensitivity and specificity for predicting new neurologic deficits in the early postoperative period. Somatosensory-evoked potentials are an effective tool for spinal cord monitoring when performing a posterior cervical laminoplasty procedure.