Loading…

Clinical manifestations and effects of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with delayed pre-hospital time in acute myocardial infarction

Summary Background Prolonged pre-hospital time for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with decreased indication for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the efficacy of primary PCI in AMI patients with prolonged pre-hospital time has not been fully investigated in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of cardiology 2010-09, Vol.56 (2), p.204-210
Main Authors: Nomura, Tetsuya, MD, Tatsumi, Tetsuya, MD, Sawada, Takahisa, MD, FJCC, Kojima, Akiteru, MD, Urakabe, Yota, MD, Enomoto-Uemura, Satoko, MD, Nishikawa, Susumu, MD, Keira, Natsuya, MD, Nakamura, Takeshi, MD, Matoba, Satoaki, MD, Yamada, Hiroyuki, MD, Matsumuro, Akiyoshi, MD, Shirayama, Takeshi, MD, Shiraishi, Jun, MD, Kohno, Yoshio, MD, Kitamura, Makoto, MD, Furukawa, Keizo, MD, FJCC, Matsubara, Hiroaki, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Summary Background Prolonged pre-hospital time for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is associated with decreased indication for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, the efficacy of primary PCI in AMI patients with prolonged pre-hospital time has not been fully investigated in Japan. Methods and results A total of 3010 consecutive AMI patients admitted to AMI-Kyoto Multi-Center Risk Study Group hospitals were retrospectively analyzed, and the clinical characteristics and in-hospital prognosis of these patients were reviewed. Patients with pre-hospital delay [elapsed time (ET) > 12 h] had a lower frequency of Killip ≥ 3 (9.3%) and less frequently received primary PCI (77.7%) compared with patients with ET ≤ 12 h. In the ET > 12 h group, older patients or patients with MI history tended to be complicated by heart failure. Primary PCI was performed for patients with ET > 12 h, irrespective of the severity of heart failure [Killip 1 (78.7%) vs Killip ≥ 2 (74.0%); p = 0.3827]. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, age [odds ratio (OR) 1.053], MI history (OR 2.860), Killip ≥ 2 (OR 10.235), and multi-vessels or left main coronary artery as culprit (OR 11.712) were significant independent positive predictors of in-hospital mortality for patients with ET > 12 h. Practice of primary PCI was not a significant negative predictor for patients with ET > 12 h (OR 0.812), but it was for patients with ET ≤ 12 h (OR 0.425). Conclusions These findings indicate that patients with ET > 12 h have a less severe condition and less frequently receive primary PCI compared with patients with ET ≤ 12 h. Although primary PCI is often performed for these patients irrespective of the severity of heart failure, no preferable effect of primary PCI on the in-hospital mortality is demonstrated. In contrary, practice of primary PCI is a significant negative predictor of in-hospital mortality for patients with ET ≤ 12 h.
ISSN:0914-5087
1876-4738
DOI:10.1016/j.jjcc.2010.05.004