Loading…
Chemotherapy of malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone
Background: Malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone (MFHB) is a rare tumour with a 3 year survival of 30%-40% when treated with surgery alone. A small number of patients have previously been treated with pre-operative chemotherapy and responses observed. The aim of the present study was to further de...
Saved in:
Published in: | Annals of oncology 1993-05, Vol.4 (5), p.409-415 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background: Malignant fibrous histiocytoma of bone (MFHB) is a rare tumour with a 3 year survival of 30%-40% when treated with surgery alone. A small number of patients have previously been treated with pre-operative chemotherapy and responses observed. The aim of the present study was to further determine the response of MFHB to pre-operative chemotherapy. Patients and methods: A non-randomised study of 18 patients with MFHB. Twelve had localised disease and 6 had pulmonary metastases. In 14 patients pre-operative treatment consisted of methotrexate 8 g/m2 on day 1, ifosfamide 3 g/m2 and doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 on day 10. This regimen was given twice and twice post-operatively. A further 4 patients received cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on day ] and doxorubicin 25 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 3. Three cycles were given preand post-operatively. Results: 15 patients had surgery after chemotherapy. Tumour necrosis was present in all resection specimens and ranged from 50%–100%. 7/15 had >90% necrosis. Disease free survival is 82% for those patients with a greater than 2 year follow-up. Conclusion: This study confirms previous reports that MFHB is a chemosensitive tumour. In view of its rarity collaborative trials are needed to establish the optimum drug treatment including drug selection dose and duration. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0923-7534 1569-8041 |
DOI: | 10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a058521 |