Assessing the Political Impact of Candidate Selection Rules: Britain in the 1990s

Do candidate selection rules affect political outcomes, and if so, in what ways? Despite widespread agreement that such rules matter, observers remain divided as to whether more inclusive rules should yield candidates who are closer to or further away from a party's likely voters. This question...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of elections, public opinion and parties public opinion and parties, 2010-08, Vol.20 (3), p.311-333
Main Authors: Mikulska, Anna B., Scarrow, Susan E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Activism
Candidates
Data analysis
Elections
Electoral behaviour
Geography
Great Britain
Political participation
Political parties
Politicians
Primary Elections
Selection Procedures
United Kingdom
United States of America
Voters
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Do candidate selection rules affect political outcomes, and if so, in what ways? Despite widespread agreement that such rules matter, observers remain divided as to whether more inclusive rules should yield candidates who are closer to or further away from a party's likely voters. This question has seldom been investigated outside of US primary elections. This paper aims to help fill this gap by investigating British parties' experiences with various candidate selection rules. Using data from the 1992 and 1997 British election and candidate studies to map the distance between parties' candidates and voters, it asks whether rule differences could explain the relative proximity of the two groups. Contrary to the fears of those who worry about unrepresentative or unstrategic member activists, it finds evidence that more inclusive selection procedures may result in a closer alignment between the views of party candidates and party voters.
ISSN:1745-7289
1745-7297
DOI:10.1080/17457289.2010.490712