Adjusting the Number Needed to Treat: Incorporating Adjustments for the Utility and Timing of Benefits and Harms

The number needed to treat is a unique and cognitively useful summary measurement for the description of medical treatments. However, the original concept lacks the means to account for multiple benefits and harms or differences in the utilities or timings of patient outcomes. The authors describe a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Medical decision making 1993-07, Vol.13 (3), p.247-252
Main Authors: Riegelman, Richard, Schroth, W. Scott
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Making
Humans
Methods
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The number needed to treat is a unique and cognitively useful summary measurement for the description of medical treatments. However, the original concept lacks the means to account for multiple benefits and harms or differences in the utilities or timings of patient outcomes. The authors describe an "adjusted" number needed to treat that allows for the inclusion of multiple harms and benefits, and also adjustments for the utilities and timings of these outcomes. This expanded version offers a richer description of medical outcomes, and may be utilized as an adjunct to traditional risk-benefit, cost-effectiveness, and de cision-analytic techniques. Key words: medical decision making; cost-effectiveness anal ysis ; decision analysis; risk-benefit analysis. (Med Decis Making 1993;13:247-252)
ISSN:0272-989X
1552-681X
DOI:10.1177/0272989X9301300312