Uncertainty in health risks due to anthropogenic primary fine particulate matter from different source types in Finland

• Published in: Atmospheric environment (1994) 2010-06, Vol.44 (17), p.2125-2132
• Main Authors: Tainio, M., Tuomisto, J.T., Pekkanen, J., Karvosenoja, N., Kupiainen, K., Porvari, P., Sofiev, M., Karppinen, A., Kangas, L., Kukkonen, J.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Air pollution; Analysis methods; Applied sciences; Assessments; Atmospheric pollution; Categories; Earth, ocean, space; Emission; Emission analysis; Exact sciences and technology; Exposure-response; External geophysics; Fine particulate matter; Health; Intake fraction; Integrated assessment; Mathematical models; Meteorology; Particles and aerosols; Pollution; Pollution abatement; Sensitivity analysis; Toxicity
• ISSN: 1352-2310; 1873-2844
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.036

The emission-exposure and exposure-response (toxicity) relationships are different for different emission source categories of anthropogenic primary fine particulate matter (PM 2.5). These variations have a potentially crucial importance in the integrated assessment, when determining cost-effective abatement strategies. We studied the importance of these variations by conducting a sensitivity analysis for an integrated assessment model. The model was developed to estimate the adverse health effects to the Finnish population attributable to primary PM 2.5 emissions from the whole of Europe. The primary PM 2.5 emissions in the whole of Europe and in more detail in Finland were evaluated using the inventory of the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) and the Finnish Regional Emission Scenario model (FRES), respectively. The emission-exposure relationships for different primary PM 2.5 emission source categories in Finland have been previously evaluated and these values incorporated as intake fractions into the integrated assessment model. The primary PM 2.5 exposure-response functions and toxicity differences for the pollution originating from different source categories were estimated in an expert elicitation study performed by six European experts on air pollution health effects. The primary PM 2.5 emissions from Finnish and other European sources were estimated for the population of Finland in 2000 to be responsible for 209 (mean, 95% confidence interval 6–739) and 357 (mean, 95% CI 8–1482) premature deaths, respectively. The inclusion of emission-exposure and toxicity variation into the model increased the predicted relative importance of traffic related primary PM 2.5 emissions and correspondingly, decreased the predicted relative importance of other emission source categories. We conclude that the variations of emission-exposure relationship and toxicity between various source categories had significant impacts for the assessment on premature deaths caused by primary PM 2.5.