Transitioning to a waterways city: municipal context, capacity and commitment

In Melbourne, Australia, the adoption of Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) and the inclusion of best practice in new urban development has shifted the "drained city" of the 1960s toward an environmentally-oriented "waterways city" for the future. However, the "waterways ci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water science and technology 2010-01, Vol.62 (1), p.162-171
Main Authors: Morison, P J, Brown, R R, Cocklin, C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Best practice
Capacity
Creeks & streams
Drainage, Sanitary
Dynamics
Geography
Local Government
Municipalities
Politics
Questionnaires
Research projects
Rivers
Rural areas
Social research
State government
Stormwater
Stormwater management
Urban areas
Urban development
Urban planning
Urban Renewal
Urbanization
Victoria
Water management
Water quality
Waterways
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In Melbourne, Australia, the adoption of Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) and the inclusion of best practice in new urban development has shifted the "drained city" of the 1960s toward an environmentally-oriented "waterways city" for the future. However, the "waterways city" is tenuous owing to the variable commitment of local municipalities to WSUD. This paper reports on the first phase of a social research project, which aims to secure a model of the waterways city by addressing the commitment and capacity deficits of local municipalities. Municipal commitment and capacity across three geographical areas in Melbourne are measured quantitatively using an innovative, comprehensive, and replicable assessment technique. The results show variability in municipal capacity and commitment across the areas, with a pronounced deficit in the rural-regional area. Consequently, intergovernmental attempts to normalise modes of integrated urban water management (such as WSUD) need to include innovative and flexible mechanisms that are responsive to the dynamics of municipal commitment and capacity. These principles have broader application to cities internationally where the management of urban stormwater is the shared responsibility of multiple governments.
ISSN:0273-1223
1996-9732
DOI:10.2166/wst.2010.289