Status groups and altruistic behaviour in dictator games

We provide evidence on the effects of social status in the dictator game. With regard to average donations from and to status groups, it turns out that (a) the higher the status of the dictator, the more she donates, and (b) the higher the status of the recipient, the less she receives in donations....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Rationality and society 2010-08, Vol.22 (3), p.353-380
Main Authors: Liebe, Ulf, Tutic, Andreas
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Altruism
Bias
Donations
Effects
Game theory
History, theory and methodology
Intragroup relations
Political sociology
Political systems, parties and institutions
Social Science Research
Social sciences
Social Status
Sociology
Status
Theory
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We provide evidence on the effects of social status in the dictator game. With regard to average donations from and to status groups, it turns out that (a) the higher the status of the dictator, the more she donates, and (b) the higher the status of the recipient, the less she receives in donations. Both tendencies are proposed by altruism. On a lower level of aggregation, we find that altruism has the highest proportion of correct predictions among all theoretical concepts under consideration (i.e. altruism, warm-glow giving, in-group bias, noblesse oblige). Surprisingly, there are rarely pure altruists on the individual level. This points at well-known problems of aggregation in social science research and challenges, among others, experimental studies on the in-group bias.
ISSN:1043-4631
1461-7358
DOI:10.1177/1043463110366232