The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast‐conserving surgery and radiation therapy

• Published in: Cancer 1994-09, Vol.74 (6), p.1746-1751
• Main Authors: Schnitt, Stuart J., Abner, Anthony, Gelman, Rebecca, Connolly, James L., Recht, Abram, Duda, Rosemary B., Eberlein, Timothy J., Mayzel, Kathleen, Silver, Barbara, Harris, Jay R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Biological and medical sciences; Breast - pathology; Breast - surgery; breast cancer; Breast Neoplasms - mortality; Breast Neoplasms - pathology; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy; Breast Neoplasms - surgery; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - mortality; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - pathology; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - radiotherapy; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast - surgery; extensive intraductal component; Female; Gynecology. Andrology. Obstetrics; Humans; local recurrence; Mammary gland diseases; margins; Medical sciences; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - mortality; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - prevention & control; Treatment Outcome; Tumors
• ISSN: 0008-543X; 1097-0142
• DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940915)74:6<1746::AID-CNCR2820740617>3.0.CO;2-Y

Background. The relationships among the involvement of tumor at the final margins of resection, the presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC), and the risk of local recurrence are important considerations in patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer but have not been defined adequately. Methods. Between 1982 and 1985, 885 patients were treated for clinical Stage I or II invasive breast cancer. The study population was limited to 181 patients with an infiltrating ductal carcinoma who received a radiation dose to the surgical site of 60 Gy or greater, whose final microscopic margins of resection were evaluable, and who had at least 5 years of follow‐up. A positive margin was defined as tumor present at the inked margin of resection, a close margin as tumor within 1 mm of the inked margin, and a negative margin as no tumor within 1 mm of the inked margin. A focally positive margin was defined as tumor at the margin in three or fewer low‐power fields. In 157 patients (87%), the tumor was evaluable for the presence or absence of an EIC. The median follow‐up was 86 months. Results. In 12 of 181 patients (7%), a recurrence developed at or near the primary site (true recurrence/marginal miss [TR/MM]) within 5 years. The 5‐year rate of TR/MM (with 95% confidence intervals) among patients with negative, close, focally positive, and more than focally positive margins was 0% (0‐4%), 4% (0‐20%), 6% (1‐17%) and 21% (10‐37%), respectively. Patients with positive margins also were more likely to have a distant failure within 5 years (14%, 8%, 25%, and 32% in the four groups, respectively). However, patients with positive margins more often had positive axillary lymph nodes than patients with negative or close margins (59% vs. 38%, P < 0.02). The 5‐year rate of TR/MM was 20% for patients with an EIC‐positive tumor and 7% for patients with an EIC‐negative tumor. However, among the 127 patients with an EIC‐negative tumor, the 5‐year rate of TR/MM was less than 10% in all margin groups. Among the 30 patients with an EIC‐positive tumor, the 5‐year rate of TR/MM was 0% when margins were negative or close but 50% when margins were more than focally positive. Conclusions. These results provide support for the use of breast‐conserving surgery and breast irradiation in all patients with uninvolved margins, whether the tumor is EIC‐positive or EIC‐negative. This study suggests that breast‐conserving therapy (including a