Facilitation of learning and state dependency with nicotine

Two studies of nicotine and memory encoding were carried out using a state-dependent design. The first experiment used cigarettes and involved memory for stimuli that could not be encoded phonemically or semantically. The results of this recognition study show that nicotine was facilitating the inpu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychopharmacologia 1986-01, Vol.89 (1), p.55-59
Main Authors: WARBURTON, D. M, WESNES, K, SHERGOLD, K, JAMES, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied sciences
Association
Biological and medical sciences
Exact sciences and technology
Female
Humans
Learning - drug effects
Male
Medical sciences
Memory - drug effects
Mental Recall - drug effects
Nicotine - pharmacology
Other techniques and industries
Smoking
Stimulation, Chemical
Tobacco, tobacco smoking
Toxicology
Verbal Behavior - drug effects
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Two studies of nicotine and memory encoding were carried out using a state-dependent design. The first experiment used cigarettes and involved memory for stimuli that could not be encoded phonemically or semantically. The results of this recognition study show that nicotine was facilitating the input of non-phonemicably encodable and non-semanticably encodable information to storage and that nicotine produced state-dependent learning. The second study used nicotine tablets and involved memory for concrete words. The results of the free recall study show that nicotine produced state-dependent learning, that nicotine was facilitating the input of information to storage, but there was no evidence that associative processes had been changed by nicotine. These findings give no support for the suggestion that a cholinergic system in the brain is controlling the encoding of intrinsic cues relating to phonemic and semantic properties of things but not those involving mnemonic encoding by mental imagery, but rather that the cholinergic system is non-specifically involved in encoding.
ISSN:0033-3158
1432-2072
DOI:10.1007/BF00175189