Loading…

Randomized, prospective study of cyanoacrylate injection, sclerotherapy, or rubber band ligation for endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding canine gastric varices

The purpose of this randomized, nonblinded study was to compare the effectiveness, safety, and technical ease of three different endoscopic techniques for the treatment of bleeding gastric varices in a canine model. Twenty dogs with large, bleeding gastric varices underwent endoscopic hemostasis wit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 1995-03, Vol.41 (3), p.201-205
Main Authors: Jutabha, Rome, Jensen, Dennis M., Egan, James, Machicado, Gustavo A., Hirabayashi, Kenneth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The purpose of this randomized, nonblinded study was to compare the effectiveness, safety, and technical ease of three different endoscopic techniques for the treatment of bleeding gastric varices in a canine model. Twenty dogs with large, bleeding gastric varices underwent endoscopic hemostasis with rubber band ligation, sclerotherapy, and cyanoacrylate injection. The time and number of attempts required to achieve definitive hemostasis were evaluated for each technique, and each method was assessed for ease of use. Ulceration rates, ulcer size and depth, and stigmata of ulcer hemorrhage were assessed at 1 week. Intravariceal sclerotherapy was the fastest and easiest to perform. Rubber band ligation was intermediate in technical ease, but it caused the largest and deepest ulcers and had the highest rates of stigmata of ulcer hemorrhage and secondary bleeding. Cyanoacrylate injection was the most cumbersome endoscopic method to perform. All three treatments were effective for controlling gastric variceal bleeding. Intravariceal sclerotherapy had the most favorable results overall because of its technical ease, efficacy, and modest complication rates. (Gastrointest Endosc 1995;41:201-5.)
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
DOI:10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70338-1