The severity of dieting and bingeing behaviors in college women: Interview validation of survey data

• Published in: Journal of psychiatric research 1995-05, Vol.29 (3), p.211-225
• Main Authors: Kurth, Candace L., Krahn, Dean D., Nairn, Karen, Drewnowski, Adam
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Adult; Anorexia Nervosa; Biological and medical sciences; Bulimia; Bulimia - diagnosis; Bulimia - epidemiology; Bulimia - psychology; College Students; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diet, Reducing - psychology; Diet, Reducing - statistics & numerical data; Eating Disorders; Female; Females; Humans; Hyperphagia - diagnosis; Hyperphagia - epidemiology; Hyperphagia - psychology; Incidence; Medical sciences; Midwestern United States - epidemiology; Personality Assessment - statistics & numerical data; Psychology. Psychoanalysis. Psychiatry; Psychometrics; Psychometrics. Diagnostic aid systems; Psychopathology. Psychiatry; Reproducibility of Results; Research Methodology; Scales; Techniques and methods; Young Adults
• ISSN: 0022-3956; 1879-1379
• DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(95)00002-M

A combined survey and interview study was conducted to validate a categorical Dieting and Bingeing Severity Scale (DBSS), and to estimate the prevalance of eating disorders in young women. We hypothesized that assignment to the DBSS categories would be confirmed by clinical interviews such that interview-diagnosed eating disorders would be found with increasing frequency and severity at the upper end of the DBSS. Freshmen college women ( n = 1367) completed a survey instrument addressing the frequency and severity of dieting, binge-eating, and other behaviors and attitudes related to weight control. Random stratified sampling procedures were used to select a subset of women ( n = 306) from each DBSS category for structured clinical interviews for DSM-III-R (SCID). Survey respondents were assigned to one of six mutually exclusive DBSS categories: non-dieters (9% of sample), casual dieters (26%), moderate dieters (23%), intense dieters (21%), dieters at-risk (19%), and probable bulimia nervosa (2%). The DBSS effectively rank-ordered subjects according to the risk of having interview-diagnosed eating disorders. Women in the three most severe DBSS categories were significantly more likely to have current subthreshold and threshold level eating disorders, in particular bulimia nervosa and eating disorder not otherwise specified (EDNOS). The estimated prevalence of current bulimia nervosa was approximately 2% by both survey and interview methods. The prevalence of current EDNOS was 13%, more than six times greater than the prevalence of bulimia nervosa. The DBSS was found to be a reliable and valid measure of dieting and bingeing severity. The survey instrument may be useful in measuring the extent of, and changes in, pathological dieting in community-based samples of young women, and in studying comorbidity of dieting and bingeing severity with other psychiatric conditions including depression and substance use. The DBSS may also be useful in identifying risk factors associated with the onset of eating disorders.