Structural Alignment in Induction and Similarity

According to a structural alignment view, representational commonalities contribute to the perception of similarity, whereas nonshared attributes related to commonalities are candidate inferences in induction. This view was tested in 5 experiments. Novel animal pairs varying in the number of attribu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition memory, and cognition, 1996-05, Vol.22 (3), p.754-770
Main Author: Lassaline, Mary E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adult
Association Learning
Attention
Cognition & reasoning
Cognitive Discrimination
Discrimination Learning
Female
Human
Humans
Inductive Deductive Reasoning
Inference
Male
Probability Learning
Problem Solving
Psychology
Stimulus Similarity
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:According to a structural alignment view, representational commonalities contribute to the perception of similarity, whereas nonshared attributes related to commonalities are candidate inferences in induction. This view was tested in 5 experiments. Novel animal pairs varying in the number of attributes and relations they shared were used to assess the relationship between induction and similarity. In Experiments 1 and 2, the number of shared attributes and the presence of 2 kinds of causal relations between attributes varied. Shared attributes increased both similarity and inductive strength judgments. Shared causal relations, possessed by both animals, influenced perceived similarity, but binding causal relations, which connected a shared attribute to a candidate inference in the induction task, were important for inductive strength. In Experiments 3-5, these results were extended through use of a noncausal relation and familiar animal categories.
ISSN:0278-7393
1939-1285
DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.22.3.754