Doppler flow velocity mapping in an in vitro model of the normal pulmonary artery

• Published in: Journal of the American College of Cardiology 1988-11, Vol.12 (5), p.1366-1376
• Main Authors: Gardin, Julius M., Sung, Hsing-Wen, Yoganathan, Ajit P., Ball, Johannes, McMillan, Scott, Henry, Walter L.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Blood Flow Velocity; Echocardiography, Doppler; Heart Rate; Humans; Models, Cardiovascular; Pulmonary Artery - physiology; Rheology; Stroke Volume
• ISSN: 0735-1097; 1558-3597
• DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)92622-8

Pulsed Doppler pulmonary artery velocity measurements are useful in evaluating a number of cardiac conditions including pulmonary hypertension, pulmonary stenosis and insufficiency, intracardiac shunts and other congenital abnormalities. However, variations in sample location relative to the arterial wall and valve have been thought to affect pulmonary artery velocity and acceleration measurements clinically. Therefore, pulsed Doppler and color flow mapping were performed in a pulsatile flow apparatus connected to a glass or Plexiglas model of the main pulmonary artery and its bifurcation, which contained a Hancock 29 mm pericardial tissue valve (5.35 cm2orifice). Doppler sample volumes were placed at four sites: 1) at the pulmonary valve leaflet tips, centrally; 2) 2 cm distal to the leaflet tips, centrally; 3) 2 cm distal but laterally near the pulmonary artery wall; and 4) at the pulmonary artery bifurcation, centrally. Doppler peak flow velocity and acceleration time were measured. There was no difference between sites 1 and 2 in peak flow velocity or acceleration time. At site 3, peak flow velocity and acceleration time were both less than at site 1 (mean ± SD, 85 ± 44 versus 105 ± 39 cm/s, p < 0.005, and 162 ± 65 versus 188 ± 46 ms, p < 0.03, respectively). Moreover, the pulmonary artery velocity contour at site 3 exhibited increased spectral dispersion and notching and increased variance on the color spectrum. At site 4, peak flow velocity was less than at site 1 (85 ± 31 versus 105 ± 39 cm/s, p < 0.005), whereas pulmonary artery acceleration time was not significantly different. In this model, Doppler pulmonary artery flow velocity was best recorded within 2 cm of the valve and in the center of the vessel. Similar studies should be performed in the human pulmonary artery to standardize the recording technique and sample sites for Doppler measurements of velocity and acceleration.