Loading…

A treadmill test of sprint running

Anaerobic power is characterized by a high degree of specificity regarding both the recruited muscles as well as the recruitment pattern. The popular Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) is a cycling test that does not satisfy the need for a running‐specific anaerobic test. We describe such a test, using a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports 1996-10, Vol.6 (5), p.259-264
Main Authors: Falk, B., Weinstein, Y., Dotan, R., Abramson, D. A., Mann-Segal, D., Hoffman, J. R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Anaerobic power is characterized by a high degree of specificity regarding both the recruited muscles as well as the recruitment pattern. The popular Wingate Anaerobic Test (WAnT) is a cycling test that does not satisfy the need for a running‐specific anaerobic test. We describe such a test, using a novel type of a commercially available treadmill (BRL 1800, Gymrol, France). The ergometer is equipped with a torque motor to neutralize the frictional resistance of the treadmill belt, and a hip‐belt harness connected to a horizontal rod. Force applied to the harness is monitored by a strain gauge mounted on the rod, while vertical movement is monitored by a potentiometer at the posterior fixed end of the rod. These, in conjunction with the treadmill belt speed, enable the computation of horizontal and vertical power as well as the combined total output. Power is calculated both as ‘peak’ power (highest 2.5 s segment) and ‘mean’ power (20 s duration). Preliminary results of young athletes were generally consistent with the expected age‐related changes in anaerobic power. Values obtained on the anaerobic treadmill were always higher than the corresponding WAnT values previously obtained in comparable age groups. The higher values were probably due to the larger muscle mass involved and the shorter peak and mean power durations (2.5 and 20 s versus 5 and 30 s in the WAnT, respectively). This test should enable not only running‐specific anaerobic power monitoring but also the characterization of the relationship between the horizontal and vertical components of that power.
ISSN:0905-7188
1600-0838
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0838.1996.tb00468.x