Adjusting for Attrition in Event-History Analysis

The sensitivity of parameter estimates of event-history models to alternative methods of correcting for panel attrition is not well understood. This paper will investigate the issue of weighting for panel attrition in event-history models by comparing alternative treatments of sampling weights in a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sociological methodology 1997-01, Vol.27 (1), p.393-416
Main Author: Hill, Daniel H.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adjustment
Americas
Analytical estimating
Attrition
Bias
Censorship
Couples
Data Collection
Developed Countries
Divorce
Divorce rates
Electronics benefit transfer
Event History Analysis
Income
Interviews
Investigations
Marital separation
Marital status
Marriage
Methodological Problems
Methodology (Data Analysis)
Methods
Modeling
Models, Theoretical
North America
Panel Data
Panel studies
Parametric models
Population
Relationship
Research Design
Sampling
Sampling Studies
Spouses
Term weighting
United States
USA
Weighting
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The sensitivity of parameter estimates of event-history models to alternative methods of correcting for panel attrition is not well understood. This paper will investigate the issue of weighting for panel attrition in event-history models by comparing alternative treatments of sampling weights in a divorce model for members of the 1986 Survey of Income and Program Participation (SIPP). Three distinct weighting procedures are compared. These are based on (1) the initial selection probability weights; (2) the 1986 SIPP panel weights; and (3) the monthly attrition-adjusted weights. The paper also compares these weighted estimates with the estimates of a structural model in which attrition is treated as an error-correlated competing alternative to divorce. Although it is impossible to identify a "best" procedure without accurate external data, significant differences in the estimates for the various procedures are indicative of significant attrition related problems in event-history models. None of the weighting adjustments are found to have any appreciable effect on the estimates of the divorce hazard model examined. The reason is that all of the weighting procedures are based on the assumption of independent censoring. The competing hazards structural model relaxes this assumption and finds evidence of significant correlated unmeasured heterogeneity. Once corrections for this are made, the net divorce hazards are seen to increase by more than one-half. This suggests that in many instances divorces in the SIPP end up being recorded as attrition.
ISSN:0081-1750
1467-9531
DOI:10.1111/1467-9531.271032