Laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in an anatomical model: results of an experimental comparative trial

• Published in: European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology 1997-03, Vol.72 (1), p.51-55
• Main Authors: Lécuru, F., Robin, F., Neji, K., Darles, C., De Bievres, P., Vildé, F., Taurelle, R.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Abdomen; Accuracy; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biological and medical sciences; Cadaver; Experimental trial; Female; Humans; Iliac Vein - injuries; Intraoperative Complications; Laparoscopy; Lymph Node Excision - methods; Medical sciences; Middle Aged; Pelvic lymphadenectomy; Surgery (general aspects). Transplantations, organ and tissue grafts. Graft diseases; Surgery of the digestive system
• ISSN: 0301-2115; 1872-7654
• DOI: 10.1016/S0301-2115(96)02652-8

Objectives: The aim of this paper was to compare the accuracy of laparoscopic versus open pelvic lymphadenectomy in an experimental trial. Study design: We performed unilateral laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomies (LPL) in 33 non-embalmed cadavers between the external iliac vein, the obliterated umbilical artery and the obturator nerve. Then a laparotomy was performed to inspect the LPL limits, look for laparoscopic complications and finally realize a controlateral lymphadenectomy. The LPL side was randomly decided. A pathologist counted the number of lymph nodes collected with both techniques. We compared the number of retrieved lymph nodes. the completeness of the dissection and the complication rate with those two procedures. Student's t-test, Z 2-test and non-parametric tests were used when appropriate. Results: No dissection had to be aborted. One hundred and twelve nodes were removed laparoscopically (mean, 3.73; S.E., 2.9) and 84 at laparotomy (mean. 2.77; S.E., 2.06). There was no significant difference in the number of nodes retrieved with both procedures. Effectiveness of laparoscopy was not significantly different in the first ten procedures, in the second ten or in the last ten LPL. Residual tissue was observed after LPL in 13.3% of the procedures whereas all open lymphadenectomies were complete. LPL sensitivity reached at least 86% in this paper. Failures were more frequent at the beginning of the study (50% among the first ten dissections), in obese subjects or in subjects with prior history of laparotomy (but the difference was not significant). Two venous injuries occurred during LPL (6.7%). Complication rates for the two techniques were not significantly different. However, the LPL complication rate was higher at the beginning of the study and increased significantly in subjects with prior history of laparotomy ( P < 0.05). Conclusions: This randomized study shows that LPL and laparotomy have similar effectiveness. Incomplete dissections and complications are more frequent in obese subjects or in case of prior history of laparotomy. Fifteen procedures seems necessary to learn the technique and provide constant and safe results in routine practice.