Preferential activation of the vastus medialis oblique, vastus lateralis, and hip adductor muscles during isometric exercises in females

• Published in: The journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy 1997-07, Vol.26 (1), p.23-28
• Main Authors: Zakaria, D, Harburn, K L, Kramer, J F
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Electromyography; Exercise - physiology; Female; Humans; Knee - physiology; Muscle Contraction - physiology; Muscle, Skeletal - physiology; Space life sciences; Temperature
• ISSN: 0190-6011; 1938-1344
• DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1997.26.1.23

Disagreement exists as to whether the individual components of the quadriceps femoris can be preferentially activated, i.e., that one muscle component is activated to a greater degree of its maximum voluntary contraction ability than the remaining components. Preferential activation of the vastus medialis (VM) might be useful in the treatment of knee patients demonstrating VM atrophy. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine if the vastus medialis oblique (VMO), vastus lateralis (VL), and hip adductor (HA) muscles were preferentially activated in females during the following maximal voluntary isometric exercises: 1) unilateral quadriceps setting (QS) with the ankle positioned in neutral, 2) unilateral quadriceps setting combined with ankle dorsiflexion (QS + D), and 3) maximal bilateral hip adduction. Integrated electromyography (IEMG in mV.sec) was determined for the VMO, VL, and HA muscles of the preferred leg (i.e., that used to kick a ball) of 20 healthy females. Data were normalized using QS exercise as the reference exercise. Nonnormalized IEMG (+/-SD) of the VMO and VL was similar during QS [i.e., VMO = 1050 (+/-802) mV.sec, VL = 1075 (+/-738) mV. sec] and QS + D exercises [i.e., VMO = 1191 (+/-738) mV.sec, VL = 1202 (+/-836) mV.sec], but significantly less than these values during hip adduction exercise [i.e., VMO = 174 (+/-62) mV. sec, VL = 194 (+/-70) mV.sec]. Nonnormalized IEMG of the HA muscles was similar during both QS and QS+D [i.e., 286 (+/-405) mV.sec and 195 (+/-432) mV.sec], but significantly higher than these values during hip adduction exercise [i.e., 413 (+/-235) mV.sec]. Normalized IEMG (+/-SD)(%) demonstrated similar patterns, i.e., the ratios for the VMO and the VL muscles did not differ from one another under either QS + D [i.e., VMO = 121 (+/-60)%, VL = 116 (+/-40)%] or hip adduction conditions [i.e., VMO = 33 (+/-24)%, VL = 36 (+/-25)%]. As a result, the degree of activation of the two muscles was considered the same. These results suggest no preferential activation of the quadriceps femoris component muscles during QS, QS + D, and hip adduction exercises in the nonweight-bearing position. The use of hip adduction to preferentially activate the VMO over the VL compared with QS exercises was not substantiated. A mean increase of 20% in the VMO and VL myoelectric activity during QS (as demonstrated by the normalized IEMG), by the addition of dorsiflexion, may be clinically significant. However, further study is re