Loading…

Expression of a coronavirus ribosomal frameshift signal in Escherichia coli: influence of tRNA anticodon modification on frameshifting

Eukaryotic ribosomal frameshift signals generally contain two elements, a heptanucleotide slippery sequence (XXXYYYN) and an RNA secondary structure, often an RNA pseudoknot, located downstream. Frameshifting takes place at the slippery sequence by simultaneous slippage of two ribosome-bound tRNAs....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of molecular biology 1997-07, Vol.270 (3), p.360-373
Main Authors: Brierley, Ian, Meredith, Michayla R, Bloys, Alison J, Hagervall, Tord G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Eukaryotic ribosomal frameshift signals generally contain two elements, a heptanucleotide slippery sequence (XXXYYYN) and an RNA secondary structure, often an RNA pseudoknot, located downstream. Frameshifting takes place at the slippery sequence by simultaneous slippage of two ribosome-bound tRNAs. All of the tRNAs that are predicted to decode frameshift sites in the ribosomal A-site (XXXY YYN ) possess a hypermodified base in the anticodon-loop and it is conceivable that these modifications play a role in the frameshift process. To test this, we expressed slippery sequence variants of the coronavirus IBV frameshift signal in strains of Escherichia coli unable to modify fully either tRNA Lys or tRNA Asn. At the slippery sequences UUUA AAC and UUUA AAU (underlined codon decoded by tRNA Asn, anticodon 5′ QUU 3′), frameshifting was very inefficient (2 to 3%) and in strains deficient in the biosynthesis of Q base, was increased (AAU) or decreased (AAC) only two-fold. In E. coli, therefore, hypomodification of tRNA Asn had little effect on frameshifting. The situation with the efficient slippery sequences UUUA AAA (15%) and UUUA AAG (40%) (underlined codon decoded by tRNA Lys, anticodon 5′ mnm 5s 2UUU 3′) was more complex, since the wobble base of tRNA Lys is modified at two positions. Of four available mutants, only trmE (s 2UUU) had a marked influence on frameshifting, increasing the efficiency of the process at the slippery sequence UUUA AAA . No effect on frameshifting was seen in trmC1 (cmnm 5s 2UUU) or trmC2 (nm 5s 2UUU) strains and only a very small reduction (at UUUA AAG ) was observed in an asuE (mnm 5UUU) strain. The slipperiness of tRNA Lys, therefore, cannot be ascribed to a single modification site on the base. However, the data support a role for the amino group of the mnm 5 substitution in shaping the anticodon structure. Whether these conclusions can be extended to eukaryotic translation systems is uncertain. Although E. coli ribosomes changed frame at the IBV signal (UUUAAAG) with an efficiency similar to that measured in reticulocyte lysates (40%), there were important qualitative differences. Frameshifting of prokaryotic ribosomes was pseudoknot-independent (although secondary structure dependent) and appeared to require slippage of only a single tRNA.
ISSN:0022-2836
1089-8638
DOI:10.1006/jmbi.1997.1134