Loading…

Effect of Training Load on OBLA Determination

Abstract Fifteen male long-distance runners, 35.9±8.2 years of age, participated in the study. They had 5.7±2.3 years of running experience, marathon best time of 2,58:51±0,14:45 h, 10-km personal record of 37:18±2:50 min, and maximal aerobic power of 64.6±5.8 ml · kg -1 · min -1 . Their 4 mM · 1 -1...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of sports medicine 1989-10, Vol.10 (5), p.346-351
Main Authors: Dotan, R., Rotstein, A., Grodjinovsky, A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Fifteen male long-distance runners, 35.9±8.2 years of age, participated in the study. They had 5.7±2.3 years of running experience, marathon best time of 2,58:51±0,14:45 h, 10-km personal record of 37:18±2:50 min, and maximal aerobic power of 64.6±5.8 ml · kg -1 · min -1 . Their 4 mM · 1 -1 lactate threshold (OBLA) was tested twice in a randomized order: once following a week of light, pre-race-like training, and once after a week of heavy training load. The parameters measured during the OBLA tests were: rating of perceived exertion (RPE), running economy (E), heart rate (HR), respiratory exchange ratio (R), and running velocity at OBLA. Compared with the light load treatment, RPE following the heavy training week rose by 0.8 units, HR and E remained unchanged, and R decreased slightly (0.012). Running velocity at OBLA was raised 0.42 km · h -1 by the heavy training, but a negative correlation was found between this change and the baseline (light load) OBLA velocity (R=-0.57). It is suggested that in athletes the usefulness of OBLA testing, aimed at assessing current performance capacity, could be compromised by lack of control over the immediately preceding training schedules. However, it appears that the susceptibility to the lack of such standardization may be reduced or absent in higher level runners.
ISSN:0172-4622
1439-3964
DOI:10.1055/s-2007-1024926