Loading…

Dietary assessment in Whitehall. II. The influence of reporting bias on apparent socioeconomic variation in nutrient intakes

Objective: To assess socio-economic differences in nutrient intake, giving particular consideration to the influence of reporting bias. Design: Cross-sectional study. Three methods of data analysis (inclusion of all subjects, exclusion of low energy reporters, and regression-based energy adjustment)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of clinical nutrition 1997-12, Vol.51 (12), p.815-825
Main Authors: Stallone, D.D, Brunner, E.J, Bingham, S.A, Marmot, M.G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Objective: To assess socio-economic differences in nutrient intake, giving particular consideration to the influence of reporting bias. Design: Cross-sectional study. Three methods of data analysis (inclusion of all subjects, exclusion of low energy reporters, and regression-based energy adjustment) were evaluated against biomarkers of fatty acid and antioxidant intakes. Setting: London-based Civil Servants. Subjects: Age and employment grade stratified random sub-sample of 459 men and 406 women aged 39-61 y who completed 7 d diet diaries at Phase 3 follow-up (1991-93) of the Whitehall II Study. Dietary measures: Mean daily intakes by employment grade (6 levels) of dietary energy, total fat, saturated fatty acids, polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), linoleic acid, carbohydrate excluding fibre, dietary fibre, protein, alcohol, vitamin C, vitamin E, carotenes, potassium and calcium. Biomarkers: serum cholesterol ester fatty acids (CEFA), total cholesterol, plasma alpha-tocopherol and beta-carotene. Results: Low energy reporting (LER), defined as a reported energy intake below 1.2 times calculated basal metabolic rate, was strongly associated with employment grade (top grade: men 17.3%, women 19.3%, bottom grade: men 45.7%, women 49.2% trend P
ISSN:0954-3007
1476-5640
DOI:10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600491